I'm still amazed he is slating Jimmy for the Aussie's getting away from 69/5 to score 268, when Finn leaked 75 runs at 5 an over, and also went for 5 an over in the 2nd innings.
Must be a complete wind up which gets more tedious by the day.
Jimmy is averaging just over 30, has the Indian sign over the Australian captain, and a very decent economy rate. Finn's 14 wickets have come towards the mid 30's average at a poor test economy rate and is releasing all pressure built up by the opening bowlers with his wayward spells.
I'd like EB to name some opposition swing bowlers from the last 20 years who have averaged 30 or less in a series in Australia, with of economy rate of 3-3.5.
Id like you to name a bowler who has come up against such a woeful Aussie side in the last 20 years.
Your comparing bowlers who have come up against a poor Aussie side (Jimmy) in relation to those who came up against some of the worlds greats
Pathetic
It ignores the fact that Jimmy has a better average than Finn and that some of Finns wickets came when the Aussies were slogging out trying to score quick runs at the end of their innings in Brisbane.
He clearly hasnt watched the cricket - i'm just surprised he hasnt lied and said he has.
Anderson gets the new ball, your the first to tell everyone how after the first 10 overs, its hard to take wickets over there. Therefore its a very good effort for Finn to have taken more wickets than the leader of our attack considering he is bolwing with an older ball