• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Jack Clarke

Raff1977 said:
How is it negative bollocks can you see us spending big money getting somebody in ? All stories about loaning players with an obligation to buy if we go up cannot see us spending any big money to bolster the squad to have a big push for promotion
Click to expand...

Everything he posts is negative. And yes i can see us spending a decent amount incl fees & wages
 

Be absolutely gutted to lose Watson but brining Clark back (not just on loan) would definitely make up for it.
Drexl said:
Would be a massive signing for the run in.
Click to expand...
Well we would 100% have beaten Burnley with him in the team for a start! Highly likely Sheffield United away too.
 
nz joe said:
Why do Ipswich keep buying wingers for big money ?
Both Philogen and Clarke on the bench today and Broadhead starts once again . Clarke got on in the 88th minute , Philogen didn't even get a run out.
Do McKenna and their DOF have different opinions on what formation and type of player they require ?
Click to expand...
Philogene came on for Broadhead on 63 mins
 
DonaldDownTheWing said:
Can you confirm if he’s been banned for his comments about race/religion or his comments about football?
Click to expand...
He got 2 warnings the other day on football related matters.

He was basically slagging me off today saying he'd proved me wrong. He hadn't proved me wrong anyway, it wasn't pure football and I don't take particularly kindly to being slagged off for nothing quite frankly.

I have taken it upon myself to ban him until June then he won't poison the board with his ridiculous 'views' anymore.

Harsh, probably but I've had quite enough of him.
 
Keith S30S said:
He got 2 warnings the other day on football related matters.

He was basically slagging me off today saying he'd proved me wrong. He hadn't proved me wrong anyway, it wasn't pure football and I don't take particularly kindly to being slagged off for nothing quite frankly.

I have taken it upon myself to ban him until June then he won't poison the board with his ridiculous 'views' anymore.

Harsh, probably but I've had quite enough of him.
Click to expand...

Thanks. Insulting other people, or the couple of posts about religion, are ban-worthy imo.

I’m not keen on people getting banned just for having a different POV so good to see it’s not just for that.
 
DonaldDownTheWing said:
In an ideal world, he’ll have gone there and made a few hundred grand, but realised there’s more to happiness than money and wants to come back to where he was happy.
Click to expand...
He looks miserable as sin the pitch aswell. Like he did when he first came here.

Hes a weird player like that.
 
Keith S30S said:
He got 2 warnings the other day on football related matters.

He was basically slagging me off today saying he'd proved me wrong. He hadn't proved me wrong anyway, it wasn't pure football and I don't take particularly kindly to being slagged off for nothing quite frankly.

I have taken it upon myself to ban him until June then he won't poison the board with his ridiculous 'views' anymore.

Harsh, probably but I've had quite enough of him.
Click to expand...
He is a tedious bore , but I’m not generally in favour of banning unless for something actually criminal. The problem is more the long tedious posts on here imho, just limit the number of words I’d say
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top