• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

How long can Rafa last?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ashley will be leaving so won't have to.

Rodgers will go somewhere he is financially backed and can achieve - an elite club won't touch him.

Only Newcastle fans hate Ashley. I'm sure Brendan doesn't care about the fans opinion of him,

:lol:

Areet

I think most of the footballing world acknowledge Ashley is not a good owner to have for an ambitious manager.

In the past decade are there many clubs who've a net profit? The club may have spent tens of millions, but without some bonkers sales, I guarantee you we wouldn't have. He's also failed to spend money on the training and youth facilities (you can't sell them for a profit, y'see) , and he's preferred free advertising for his tat-store to allowing other commercial partners to advertise in the ground.
 

Honest answer is, I don't know.

So much depends on the takeover. If it goes through and Benitez is given £xxx to pump into the playing squad, then yes I think we can pay the going rate for a decent #10, plus the extra we'll need to throw his way to convince him to come.

If it doesn't go through, then no, we won't.
Aye, I imagine its going to be a case of watch this space. If the takeover goes ahead, I could see Arsenal being willing to take someone's eyes out with Walcott but I'm not sure he'd be what you needed atm. Without the takeover, you're probably looking at the likes of Jason Puncheon or someone of that ilk which although he's probably better than any number 10 you currently have, I'm not too sure how well he'd be received by the fans.
 
Their next 4 games on paper are very tricky and I would not be surprised if they lost all 4 (but then again its these games that they sadly surprise me with a win or 2)

Everton (H)
Arsenal (A)
West Ham (A)
Man City (H)

If this takeover does not happen and he is not backed in Jan, I think he will walk to avoid another relegation on his Cv
Can see them beating Everton and West Ham.
 
Aye, I imagine its going to be a case of watch this space. If the takeover goes ahead, I could see Arsenal being willing to take someone's eyes out with Walcott but I'm not sure he'd be what you needed atm. Without the takeover, you're probably looking at the likes of Jason Puncheon or someone of that ilk which although he's probably better than any number 10 you currently have, I'm not too sure how well he'd be received by the fans.

Walcott is quality, but not the kind of #10 we need. We need a creative player with a good eye for a pass and composure on the ball. I'd have liked Will Hughes in the summer to be honest.

Puncheon is a fine attacking midfielder, but not really what the 4-2-3-1 needs. If Jack Wilshere wasn't made of glass I'd love to see him at St James'

Plus we need a striker like we had in Demba Ba; strong, mobile, good in the air, good finisher, but not yet on the RADAR of the big sides.
 
A quick comparison with McLaren in 2015/16 season shows he had 16points after 16 games, and they'd beaten Liverpool, drawn with Chelsea, got a point at Man Utd and beat Spurs at the Lane. The rumblings of discontent were evident then with McLaren, just shows how much They're prepared to tolerate shit perforformances and shift blame when it comes to Rafa.
 
Walcott is quality, but not the kind of #10 we need. We need a creative player with a good eye for a pass and composure on the ball. I'd have liked Will Hughes in the summer to be honest.

Puncheon is a fine attacking midfielder, but not really what the 4-2-3-1 needs. If Jack Wilshere wasn't made of glass I'd love to see him at St James'

Plus we need a striker like we had in Demba Ba; strong, mobile, good in the air, good finisher, but not yet on the RADAR of the big sides.

Aye, don't we all. I don't know who Watford's scouts are but they seem to be very good at finding that kind of physical striker of late.
 
I think most of the footballing world acknowledge Ashley is not a good owner to have for an ambitious manager.

In the past decade are there many clubs who've a net profit? The club may have spent tens of millions, but without some bonkers sales, I guarantee you we wouldn't have. He's also failed to spend money on the training and youth facilities (you can't sell them for a profit, y'see) , and he's preferred free advertising for his tat-store to allowing other commercial partners to advertise in the ground.

It seems everyone but Benitez knew.

Unless he did know and just wanted the money of course.
 
Their next 4 games on paper are very tricky and I would not be surprised if they lost all 4 (but then again its these games that they sadly surprise me with a win or 2)

Everton (H)
Arsenal (A)
West Ham (A)
Man City (H)

If this takeover does not happen and he is not backed in Jan, I think he will walk to avoid another relegation on his Cv

We will be in the bottom 3 after the City game. Apart from Merino his signings last summer have been shite.
 
Exactly, biggest fish in a puddle in Celtic, or Ashley's pennypinching Newcastle in the Premier League
Last 10 seasons Ashley spent - £36m, £55m, £75m, £38m, £2m, £26m, £23m, £10m, £1.5m and£30m.
Apart from 2 of them seasons (£2m and £1.5m) all his managers have been well backed with countless millions to spend.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top