luvulongtime
Striker
getting mine sunday
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Interesting, thank you. Hope all goes well for you.I had my third primary dose (not my booster) yesterday afternoon, after receiving a letter advising me that informed me that I needed this due to having a significantly weakened immune system.
Looks as though I'll have a fourth dose, the booster, in around 6 months.
Had booster Monday last week, still not showing on NHS app as having been done
Anyone else in same boat?
Things got a bit worse, Neutropenic Sepsis. Luckily caught it very early and Sunderland Royal have been great sorting it. Hopefully home tomorrow if WBCs continue to rise. Almost certainly a result of chemo and Pfizer vaccine.Mother is in hospital with a bit of a reaction after her booster and flu vaccine yesterday and chemo. Nothing major, just sickness but took her in because she’s cancer patient.
Sunderland Royal were great. Straight in at A&E, obs done, no waiting, straight round to side room away from everyone else. Then up to a side room on a ward for bloods X-ray and urinalysis.
We had AZ for first two and Pfizer booster. The nurse assured us they were compatible.Still waiting for my second jab. Nowhere seems to have the AZ one
Another poll.
This time it isn't so much about the vaccine type/manufacturer but how many vaccines received. Currently it seems that moderna or pfizer are the vaccines of choice for the booster jab, but in the early days of vaccination AZ wasn't used. It will be interesting to see if the booster changes to AZ as time goes on. Comments on vaccine name welcome.
3rd dose information from jcvi
( ^ not the booster dose)
You can change your vote as your situation changes. Use CHANGE VOTE at bottom right of poll
***************
@The Lambton Worm
@Jap Stammer
@addicted_to_safc
@Billericay Dichio
The paper is on medrixv.Not peered reviewed yet, but interesting nonetheless. This is maybe why I had such a bad reaction to the second jab...haven't been offered the booster, so that tells a tale. As an aside, is it possible that the anti vaxers all have antibodies through unknown infection?
Large Israeli study: Natural immunity provides 13 times more protection against Delta than Pfizer's vaccine does
Big news from Maccabi Healthcare Services, which tracked many thousands of people for this (not yet peer-reviewed) study. If its findings are borne out, anyone who’s had COVID should be allowed...hotair.com
Just had a look on the ONS...what an impressive climb in vaxed people developing antibodies from late December 2020 to August 2021The paper is on medrixv.
Their methodology does lead to slight bias against vaccines so I'm not sure it'll get picked up by anyone to get published as it is at the moment.
I don't know if the bias would be enough to drastically change the conclusions drawn but until it's addressed I doubt any bigger publisher would take it on.
I guess if they took the local case fatality rates at the time of the study they could remodel to account for it.
In relation to antivaxers it's possible but highly unlikely.
It seems clear that infection + vaccine offers best protection from the virus and the best way to get that with the least risk of death or long lasting illness is vaccine first. (not that I'm advocating anyone willingly get infected)
My father who has underlying conditions kidney cancer has a bad reaction to the booster and it nearly killed him. I’m happy enough with my 2 jabs.Mother is in hospital with a bit of a reaction after her booster and flu vaccine yesterday and chemo. Nothing major, just sickness but took her in because she’s cancer patient.
Sunderland Royal were great. Straight in at A&E, obs done, no waiting, straight round to side room away from everyone else. Then up to a side room on a ward for bloods X-ray and urinalysis.
Same here had mine 2 weeks ago (booster), still not on my NHS app. I made sure I got a card to show I'd had it done, but I had to ask for itO
I wonder what the craic is regarding those that volunteered to deliberately get infected.The paper is on medrixv.
Their methodology does lead to slight bias against vaccines so I'm not sure it'll get picked up by anyone to get published as it is at the moment.
I don't know if the bias would be enough to drastically change the conclusions drawn but until it's addressed I doubt any bigger publisher would take it on.
I guess if they took the local case fatality rates at the time of the study they could remodel to account for it.
In relation to antivaxers it's possible but highly unlikely.
It seems clear that infection + vaccine offers best protection from the virus and the best way to get that with the least risk of death or long lasting illness is vaccine first. (not that I'm advocating anyone willingly get infected)