But it was a criminal case ffs she wouldn't even be needed to testify.We heard the evidence
Only reason it isn’t in a court of law is because she realised she’d be off the gravy train with her bairn.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But it was a criminal case ffs she wouldn't even be needed to testify.We heard the evidence
Only reason it isn’t in a court of law is because she realised she’d be off the gravy train with her bairn.
Didnt she also put up a load of pictures of her bruised and beaten from her. Facts are a lot of women go back to domestic abusers, even if they arent ruch and famous. Who knows whats gone on behind the scenes 100% but we do have audio of him attempting to rape her and puctures of her beaten uo that she alleged was by Greenwood.But the woman is now pregnant from him so everyone should not jump to conclusions; we don't know the context or facts behind the case that was dropped and the speculation is not good for any party.
So if it didn’t go to court it didn’t happen? You might have a point if it was all rumour/conjecture or one word against another but it’s clear as dayAll i'm talking about is the principle - would i want him at SAFC no obviously not and i didn't even mention about him playing football again - but talking about evidence that has not gone to court then I don't think it's right simple as.
Plenty of criminal cases fall over because the key witness refuses to testify.But it was a criminal case ffs she wouldn't even be needed to testify.
There’s a reason why so many few rape cases go to Court. Without a co-operative defendant it becomes near impossible, even if she was compelled to testify. We’ve all seen the pictures and heard the audio. Really grim.
Then any view you have is uninformed.No we havent
I think he means coerciveI think not.
Then any view you have is uninformed.
If I was a Man U player and had a daughter, I’d refuse to train or play with him. He’s a danger to women.
I haven't seen any video myself and just read the transcript from it, but how can watching video evidence uninform someone of what actually happened? CCTV is going to be redundant if that's the case. Dashcam car camera prices plummeting as we speak after this newsI would argue the reverse, watching dodgy videos is more likely to uninform you
I haven't seen any video myself and just read the transcript from it, but how can watching video evidence uninform someone of what actually happened? CCTV is going to be redundant if that's the case. Dashcam car camera prices plummeting as we speak after this news![]()
Surely you can't get more legit evidence than video evidencebecause we dont know if that evidence is legit for starters