Ghislaine Maxwell Trial

[ravydavygravy]

Anyone following?

Can’t believe she’s lasted this long tbh.

She must have some serious dirt on some serious people.

 

[SAFC1962]

I'm guessing that this thread may end up in Mr Parsnip fairly quickly
Reading the paper I see what the prosecution say & think "guilty", then read the defence & think "innocent"!
I certainly think her jail conditions have been abhorrent and very unfair (in the land of the free!).
To me there are too many grey areas, hence, the options of either freedom or a real whole life sentence are too far apart.
She has not killed anyone, many alleged offences were over 10 years ago and she may have acted under duress. Very difficult case!

 

[Meathead]

I'm guessing that this thread may end up in Mr Parsnip fairly quickly
Reading the paper I see what the prosecution say & think "guilty", then read the defence & think "innocent"!
I certainly think her jail conditions have been abhorrent and very unfair (in the land of the free!).
To me there are too many grey areas, hence, the options of either freedom or a real whole life sentence are too far apart.
She has not killed anyone, many alleged offences were over 10 years ago and she may have acted under duress. Very difficult case!

Really? I thought the exact opposite when I read how the pilot had been testifying yesterday. Thought she was Donald ducked, but then again I’m not an expert on law.

 

[safcforever]

i wish they'd broadcast this one. I can see why they didn't but it would have been very interesting

 

[Professor Yaffle]

I'm guessing that this thread may end up in Mr Parsnip fairly quickly
Reading the paper I see what the prosecution say & think "guilty", then read the defence & think "innocent"!
I certainly think her jail conditions have been abhorrent and very unfair (in the land of the free!).
To me there are too many grey areas, hence, the options of either freedom or a real whole life sentence are too far apart.
She has not killed anyone, many alleged offences were over 10 years ago and she may have acted under duress. Very difficult case!

Grooming a 14 year old lass then joining in with her and Epstein in a threesome. She's a foul creature, just like her fat thief of a father.

 

[jaxaxe]

I wonder if Prince Andrew is sweating yet ?

 

[Kent_Mackem]

I wonder if Prince Andrew is sweating yet ?

If she was going to spill the beans to save her own skin then that deal would have been made long before any trial started to save her the several months of remand time inside prison while the trial was being prepared.

So I think it is unlikely to happen now.

 

[Boots]

I reckon Boris has had a dabble as well. ( Ghislaine i mean, not Prince Andrew)

 

[Butcher's Coat]

WAD

 

[Sam Handwich]

She has not killed anyone, many alleged offences were over 10 years ago and she may have acted under duress

Good job your not the judge then or she'd be walking.

 

[Mackem00]

I'm guessing that this thread may end up in Mr Parsnip fairly quickly
Reading the paper I see what the prosecution say & think "guilty", then read the defence & think "innocent"!
I certainly think her jail conditions have been abhorrent and very unfair (in the land of the free!).
To me there are too many grey areas, hence, the options of either freedom or a real whole life sentence are too far apart.
She has not killed anyone, many alleged offences were over 10 years ago and she may have acted under duress. Very difficult case!

Daft as a brush.

 

[Butcher's Coat]

I'm guessing that this thread may end up in Mr Parsnip fairly quickly
Reading the paper I see what the prosecution say & think "guilty", then read the defence & think "innocent"!
I certainly think her jail conditions have been abhorrent and very unfair (in the land of the free!).
To me there are too many grey areas, hence, the options of either freedom or a real whole life sentence are too far apart.
She has not killed anyone, many alleged offences were over 10 years ago and she may have acted under duress. Very difficult case!

The SMB already have her guilty marra.
Pointless arguing or discussing it.

 

[tonyfromalnwick]

Clinton and Trump both mentioned. Who next ?

 

[buster]

WAD

Agree.

 

[safcforever]

I'm guessing that this thread may end up in Mr Parsnip fairly quickly
Reading the paper I see what the prosecution say & think "guilty", then read the defence & think "innocent"!
I certainly think her jail conditions have been abhorrent and very unfair (in the land of the free!).
To me there are too many grey areas, hence, the options of either freedom or a real whole life sentence are too far apart.
She has not killed anyone, many alleged offences were over 10 years ago and she may have acted under duress. Very difficult case!

Fair enough then

 

[Kitch]

If she knows as much as Epstein knew then she's in serious danger!!!

 

[safcforever]

“The abuse would happen once every two weeks when she was aged between 14 and 16 and she travelled with them 10 times to New York and Santa Fe, jurors were told.”

What did the parents of that young lass think was happening?

 

[ravydavygravy]

Power: The Maxwells is a good podcast about this.

Pretty sure it implies Epstein was bankrolling couch someone.

This post will self-destruct in 5 minutes.

 

[Alcoholic_Author]

WAD

Fuck off man she’s satan incarnate, her cavity is probably 900 years old and your nob would drop off within 24 hours.

 

[Big Jeff]

The was a report the other day saying she was broke and her weathly friends all want to distance themselves from the case.