• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Geertruida


Suppose that’s the right way to handle it from the club, yes we’re not going to stand in your way, understand it’s a big move etc etc. but we want to get our replacement. As we haven’t we can’t let you go.

Firm but fair (exactly what I was whining on about wanting this morning).

For all we know, could even be a gentleman’s agreement with Liverpool we’ll let him go in the summer at a fair price?
 
if it’s true he had conversations at the club to say goodbye / say he wanted to go to Liverpool as per reports earlier, he’ll have to show he’s still committed to the club and the cause.

Not fussed if he went and we replaced or stayed. Because his versatility is useful to the squad.

Happy to have him here since he knows the club and has shown on occasion to be useful.

Glad we aren’t just rolling over and letting him go either
I said earlier, if the rumours about us allowing him to go if we got a replacement are true, but because we haven’t been able to, he respects we would have let him go if we’d been able to get a replacement, and now just gets his head down and does the business.
 
Suppose that’s the right way to handle it from the club, yes we’re not going to stand in your way, understand it’s a big move etc etc. but we want to get our replacement. As we haven’t we can’t let you go.

Firm but fair (exactly what I was whining on about wanting this morning).

For all we know, could even be a gentleman’s agreement with Liverpool we’ll let him go in the summer at a fair price?
They won’t want him then, seems like they just want a plug gap player until Frimpong/Bradley is back in the summer
 
He is and he does.
But he's started seven games this season and had Granit not been injured I suspect it would have been less of a concern when he left.
He was Slots captain at Feyenoord for three seasons and he he clearly has a relationship with him similar to the one Le Fee enjoys with Le Bris.
No point worrying about things out of your control or things you can't change.
So why didn't he take him when he first went to Liverpool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sid
Suppose that’s the right way to handle it from the club, yes we’re not going to stand in your way, understand it’s a big move etc etc. but we want to get our replacement. As we haven’t we can’t let you go.

Firm but fair (exactly what I was whining on about wanting this morning).

For all we know, could even be a gentleman’s agreement with Liverpool we’ll let him go in the summer at a fair price?
We don’t own him though!?
 
Back
Top