• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Frank Lampard - manager rumours


Roker Mackem said:
In this case there'll be no other reason other than a few significant bets placed. Probably not even that much money involved but because they havent got an exchange market to go up against they'll be very cautious.


Cannot wait for your pearls of wisdom on the season 2 thread as you excitedly consume all the you tube hater videos :lol:
Click to expand...

Nah! The damage is already done..........:lol:
 
CornerShop said:
I don't think Lampard would be a bad appointment, but the witch hunt will start regardless.
Click to expand...
I agree, if he definitely is appointed. I think from the clubs perspective, they’re banking on a big name keeping our best players at the club, and raise our profile in the process. It’ll be interesting to see how he reacts to us selling our best assets down the line.
 
rentaghost said:
Challinor maybe - I would certainly have preferred us to secure Rosenior or Still rather then someone who I feel doesn't have much of a clue.
Click to expand...
Knowing a player who played under him at Fylde, I doubt the players would be as happy. Bully beef holds no ground with him like.
 
tunstallhill said:
Looking for any positives in this, at least he may be an attractive manager for most players to work for, given his success on the field

No idea how good he is as a manage, but at least he's managed a decent amount of games at a higher level than where we are at. He won't be overawed by the place or the job

10x better than the f***ing st.mirren manager or the Stockport manager
Click to expand...
Just unfortunate he's a Tory sympathiser
 
Hendon Mad Frog said:
They aren't as the only thing I've said is that bookies don't ONLY shorten odds because of bets placed.

If that's ridiculous to you, then you must have lived a very sheltered life.
Click to expand...
Stop backtracking here marra. You very clearly suggested the bookies MUST know something as the odds on Lampard shortened. Several people explained to you how odds work but you continued your suggestion of the inside knowledge. There’s no MUST about it…if people bet on something then the odds shorten
 
Boris Bear said:
Stop backtracking here marra. You very clearly suggested the bookies MUST know something as the odds on Lampard shortened. Several people explained to you how odds work but you continued your suggestion of the inside knowledge. There’s no MUST about it…if people bet on something then the odds shorten
Click to expand...

Not backtracking at all and you clearly cant' read either. I didn't suggest they must know something at all. All I said is that they're well connected and that odds are shortened for a variety of reasons. Do try and keep up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top