Formation if we sign sharp, wyke and eisa

[Bishop Mackem]

sounds it tbf mate. if he's not on your radar should he really be on safcs?

not at all mate, molyneux out

 

[DjangoMango]

As long as it's not 5 at the back which I NEVER want to see again after Coleman

 

[Tin Soldier]

Four four f***ing two.

All right Mr Basset

 

[horselover]

As long as it's not 5 at the back which I NEVER want to see again after that negative bastard

Tidied

 

[Super Ted]

McLaughlin
Matthews Ozturk Baldwin James
Gooch McGeough Evans McGeady
Wyke Sharp
​

Ruiter
Flanagan
Love
Honeyman
Maguire
Eisa
Maja

We are doing it!

​

 

[DjangoMango]

I'd prefer 442, but I think it'll be flexible. More to come & more to leave still, but he's how it's looking. Defence the priority to strengthen after the forwards are in. But this shows there's at least a bit of depth there.

(first team)
McLaughlin
Matthews------Ozturk ----------New Centre-back -----James

McGeouch-------------Evans
Eisa ---------------------------------------------- McGeady

Wyke------Sharp



(second team/squaddies)
Ruitter
Love------Flanagan ------New Centre-back-------Left back?

Embleton--------------Robson

McManaman ----------Maguire-----------------Gooch

Maja
​

Players not used: Cattermole, Honeyman, Mumba, Watmore, Benji Kimpioka, Hume, Molyneux, Nelson

​

 

[horselover]

If we sign these 3 I'd go this as the squad stands:
...................McLaughlin.................
Matthews...Ozzy...Flange...James
.........McGeouch.......Evans............
McManaman..................McGeady
..................Wyke........Eisa...............

Subs from: Ruiter, Love, Hume,
Robson, Gooch, Embleton, Mumba,
Molyneux, Kampioka, McGuire, Maja, Nelson

The rest can fuck off, Honeyman & Cattermole included

Hopefully 2 or 3 defenders to come in as well and Watmore obviously