Flat Earthers

[jayjaysafc]

If I had fact based evidence of everything then I'd have no need to question anything.

I suspect even if someone could be bothered to type out a satisfactory answer you still wouldn't belive it.

I do get where you're coming from though as a lot of science is theoretical and some people find it hard to comprehend. It's not about following the herd as you say, I'm offended by that.
I choose to trust and believe the scientists who have dedicated their entire lives to studying this instead of some individuals who make stuff up in their bedrooms without doing any kind of studying whatsoever.
Don't even think of replying with the words "do your own research on the internet"

 

[Prefab]

i think theres 2 reasons "they " lie about the nature of earth 1.to hide further lands/resources and 2 . to push the idea of big bang and the idea we are just one happy accident rather than a alternative , as with everything its about power and control

Where are these further lands/resources?

The 'big bang' has nothing to do with the shape of the earth. If indeed the universe has a creator/designer why make the earth flat yet every other celestial object (of large enough mass) a sphere.

Cue space is fake argument in 3 2 1....

 

[pillars of hercules]

Where are these further lands/resources?

The 'big bang' has nothing to do with the shape of the earth. If indeed the universe has a creator/designer why make the earth flat yet every other celestial object (of large enough mass) a sphere.

Cue space is fake argument in 3 2 1....

If true the big bang is responsible for the shape of everything

Go and tell Copernicus

Whats the point? He's dead.

 

[cosmicchris00]

I suspect even if someone could be bothered to type out a satisfactory answer you still wouldn't belive it.

I do get where you're coming from though as a lot of science is theoretical and some people find it hard to comprehend

A good point which, if he was arguing about the angular velocity of distant spiral galaxies, i'd be happy to discuss and potentially agree with.

Flat earth no such thing as gravity nonsense is exactly that... nonsense

 

[Prefab]

If true the big bang is responsible for the shape of everything

Yeah you're of course right, what I meant was the fundamental forces including gravity exist whether the universe has a natural origin or not.

 

[pillars of hercules]

Yeah you're of course right, what I meant was the fundamental forces including gravity exist whether the universe has a natural origin or not.

I must admit I can't get my head round the 'big bang'. Where did the God particle come from?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

I hope you find peace one day

I hope we all find peace because there's little of it in the world today.

 

[Prefab]

I must admit I can't get my head round the 'big bang'. Where did the God particle come from?

A universe from nothing - Lawrence Krauss

The particle at the end of the universe - Brian Greene iirc

both a decent read for us mere mortals if you haven't already.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

You must be logged on to see external links

[/URL]

In the same way that light is accepted,... you can see it but how does it actually work... or do you question the existence of that too

Course I question it.
But back to gravity. Do you know what it is?

 

[payne]

I must admit I can't get my head round the 'big bang'. Where did the God particle come from?

Nobody knows how it started or why. All we know is that there appears to have been an event 13.8 billion years ago.

Inventing domes and flat earth's don't do anything to help

Course I question it.
But back to gravity. Do you know what it is?

We measure the effects it has on objects and because of that can send rockets around planets, make planes fly and

I hope we all find peace because there's little of it in the world today.

There would be a bit more if fruit loops didn't spread falsehoods causing division

 

[Nukehasslefan]

It works because of basic maths and geometry. Belief has nothing to do with it.

I do see you completely avoided explaining how everyone facing south can all see the southern cross.

You're making an assumption that people are stood with their backs to the centre of a circle and arguing that they can't see the southern cross.

That's no argument.

 

[Tees Exile]

Whats the point? He's dead.

Because it makes as much sense as flat earth theory

 

[parm]

Where are these further lands/resources?

The 'big bang' has nothing to do with the shape of the earth. If indeed the universe has a creator/designer why make the earth flat yet every other celestial object (of large enough mass) a sphere.

Cue space is fake argument in 3 2 1....

i suspect the further lands are down past antartica , the shape of objects in the sky has no relation whatsover to do with the nature of earth

 

[payne]

i suspect the further lands are down past antartica , the shape of objects in the sky has no relation whatsover to do with the nature of earth

Why has no1 been down there, or flew over?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

I suspect even if someone could be bothered to type out a satisfactory answer you still wouldn't belive it.

Maybe, maybe not.
If the answer is factual then I'd have to believe it.

I do get where you're coming from though as a lot of science is theoretical and some people find it hard to comprehend. It's not about following the herd as you say, I'm offended by that.

We all follow the herd. It just depends in what way. The following varies and includes myself, massively. Very few, if any escape following the herd mentality.

I choose to trust and believe the scientists who have dedicated their entire lives to studying this instead of some individuals who make stuff up in their bedrooms without doing any kind of studying whatsoever.

I have absolutely no issue whatsoever about who you choose to trust and your reasons.
There's many many scientists do amazing work. Many people inventing new stuff.

I love science and I have the highest regard for real scientists.
The issue is in trusting the one's that are theoretical down to pseudo.

Don't even think of replying with the words "do your own research on the internet"

I won't.
Do whatever you want to do. I have no issue with it.

 

[cosmicchris00]

Course I question it.
But back to gravity. Do you know what it is?

It's in the link.

Is reading something you also struggle with?

Try this

You must be logged on to see external links

 

[payne]

Why has no1 been down there, or flew over?

i suspect the further lands are down past antartica , the shape of objects in the sky has no relation whatsover to do with the nature of earth

Apart from they are governed by the same laws of nature.

 

[pillars of hercules]

A universe from nothing - Lawrence Krauss

The particle at the end of the universe - Brian Greene iirc

both a decent read for us mere mortals if you haven't already.

You can't get something from nothing though.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

It's in the link.

Is reading something you also struggle with?

Try this

You must be logged on to see external links

[/URL]

I asked if you knew what gravity is.

Can you show me what gravity is.
I know you've been told what it does. It allows mass to attract mass or something, in your book, right?

What is it as a force?

Apart from they are governed by the same laws of nature.

What laws of nature?

 

[Prefab]

i suspect the further lands are down past antartica , the shape of objects in the sky has no relation whatsover to do with the nature of earth

There aren't, I've been there as have thousands of members of HM forces and civilians of many nations. You can book a cruise down there right now yourself to satisfy your curiosity if you choose.

Why does the shape of objects in space have no relation to to the shape of the earth?