sketchy
Winger
Fuck off
The Cine lenses are unreal. I've hired them before, it is a kick in the bollocks when you have to go back to measley L lenses!
Finally gone full-frame
- Thread starter Lonz
- Start date
- Status
Fuck off
The Cine lenses are unreal. I've hired them before, it is a kick in the bollocks when you have to go back to measley L lenses!
I've been thinking of hiring a phase one 645df+ but decided against it for the same reasonFuck off
The Cine lenses are unreal. I've hired them before, it is a kick in the bollocks when you have to go back to measley L lenses!
A
ajax_andy
Guest
Own both and the 5D MKIII pisses all over the 6D... ISO performance seems identical but the AF of the 5D, the cross focus points, the auto WB, the dual card slots etc make it night and day.
Hate how the 6D takes a week to lock focus indoors if it's only a little dim especially when the 5D will lock the same shot in an instant.
6D is a canny hobbyist full framer but the 5D is a beast in comparison. Gonna replace the 6D with another MKIII as soon as I can justify it (wife isn't convinced about this purchase
)
HebburnMackem
Striker
So the larger sensor means that each photon bin (pixel) is bigger than on a crop sensor and thus more sensitive to light. Apart from that, what gives it a better IQ (assuming you're using the right lenses on both sensors).
Does the larger sensor affect the spherical distortion differently?
Does the larger sensor affect the spherical distortion differently?
I don't think it's as black and white as full frame is better than crop, crop does have benefits.
Full frame generally will have more dynamic range, better colour depth, more shallow dof is achievable, much better ISO performance.
It depends what you shoot. I was hovering over buying a Sony today which would put my canon up for sale of you fancied the plunge
HebburnMackem
Striker
I see, very compelling differences. Maybe next year as I have no need to change over just yet.
I
Icarebecauseyoudo
Guest
What kind of stuff are you thinking of doing with the phase?
portraits. I simply couldn't be arsed with flakey models though so I'm back into stretching my legs and getting out for landscapes.
and I'm looking at a Sony A7R for landscape, gan have a look. You'll probably sell your gear.
Last edited:
I
Icarebecauseyoudo
Guest
I dare say the sensor is good, but that's only part of the battle. Using a technical camera with the movements and stitching options with a phase one back just cannot be beaten
alas, for a enthusiast such as myself they're simply too pricey.
I
Icarebecauseyoudo
Guest
aye and then the lenses, and body...Sell everything else
p25s (fantastic back) down to about 2.5k now second hand
HebburnMackem
Striker
Someone I know recently shot a wedding in a church with a Nikon D800. From the photos it looks like he was in program mode and forced it to 6400. The noise was comparable to mine @ 1600. :/
Apart from being FF, the D800 is a very impressive body.
Apart from being FF, the D800 is a very impressive body.
Nikon is better than Canon IMO, especially the higher end. Canon glass is better though.
E M P I R E
Central Defender
I shoot on a Canon 7D, Nikon D4 and a couple Phase One cameras but I've just bought the Nikon D800 and it's amazing.
we should see more of you in this part of the board marra.
E M P I R E
Central Defender
you don't have a big stopper and you have phase one's, you could practically marry @IcarebecauseyoudoBut I don't own a Big Stopper or any Lee filters! I'm not sure I'd fit in
- Status
