• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Durham vs Surrey - CC Match Thread

Parkside said:
North is the Director of cricket i.e. His mandate is the overall direction that cricket takes across the club. The club is spiralling downwards at both senior and junior levels. North is responsible for playing and coaching appointment at all levels.The buck stops at North.
Click to expand...
So the equivalent of Speakman at SAFC…still not sure how he can be blamed for the inconsistency of Gay, and disappointment of Rhodes and Newsham …players we all thought would improve our side?
Hetty said:
This is like a Sunderland match thread, everyone panicking

See how it goes, we might bowl Surrey out for 49

KTF!!!
Click to expand...
The same Surrey who scored 800 against us a couple of weeks ago ?
 
Last edited:

bedlington mackem said:
So the equivalent of Speakman at SAFC…still not sure how he can be blamed for the inconsistency of Gay, and disappointment of Rhodes and Newsham …players we all thought would improve our side?

The same Surrey who scored 800 against us a couple of weeks ago ?
Click to expand...
Pitch is terrible thou, won't be easy for Surrey
 
Let’s see how our bowlers get on then, because just looking at the scorecard without context, that was pathetic
 
Fully expect with their batting line up to be commencing our second innings over 400 behind .... hoping its a tough pitch that justifies our shocking total but somehow doubt it.
 
bedlington mackem said:
So the equivalent of Speakman at SAFC…still not sure how he can be blamed for the inconsistency of Gay, and disappointment of Rhodes and Newsham …players we all thought would improve our side?

The same Surrey who scored 800 against us a couple of weeks ago ?
Click to expand...
Not so sure that Speakman has as much authority as North but I'd have thought my outlining of North's duties clarified why he should be held responsible. He appointed the inconsistent Gay and the disappointing Rhodes and Newsham. Not to mention the injury prone overseas plus Gay and DeLeede reluctance to commit fully to Durham.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top