• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Durham V Sussex - LVCC

Status
Not open for further replies.

Defeat by 2 wickets in the end, despite 5-58 from Braithwaite.

Also seems to be a mistake picking Borthwick as well. Batted eight and only bowled 12 overs all game, going 1-58. Surely with Blackwell as the main spinner it should mean we can play the extra seamer or even play the more experienced Breese.
 
Disappointing result against a team that will no doubt prop the table up come September. Durham left themselves with way too much to do. Six wickets was always a massive ask.

Still onwards and upwards.
 
Heard Breese dropped Wells at 2nd slip about the 3rd over in. Might have all been different if it stuck :-(
 
Marko said:
Heard Breese dropped Wells at 2nd slip about the 3rd over in. Might have all been different if it stuck :-(
Click to expand...
First over. I arrived about 11.15am with the bairns and he had been dropped. Difficult chance though apparently. I left with 20 runs needed and 3 more wickets went down.
 
My Boy Harry said:
Disappointing result against a team that will no doubt prop the table up come September. Durham left themselves with way too much to do. Six wickets was always a massive ask.

Still onwards and upwards.
Click to expand...

But let's be consistent with your persona on the PF.

It has to be has to be somebody's fault, surely ?

That Cook fella, lad....
 
ollie c said:
But let's be consistent with your persona on the PF.

It has to be has to be somebody's fault, surely ?

That Cook fella, lad....
Click to expand...
There is a continuing inconsistency with DCCC that has spilled over into the Warwickshire game.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top