• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Don Goodman


I was in a pub in Keswick and this lass was walking a dog past the pub...the dog tried to come in the pub and when the lass kept walking the dog sat down and refused to move 😆
So basically she doesn't usually walk the dog, the usual walker will always call in for a pint on the way past, lass had probably been nagging that it takes him too long to walk the dog and she can do it much quicker herself.
 
He was a disgrace last night he really was. Sky as a whole have now allowed their coverage to become dominated by what would be the best story rather than the live action. They were gagging for “Tom Brady’s Birmingham overturn Ipswich, a Premier League side from last year, on return to Championship” As a result they didn’t commentate properly on a blatant foul that lead to Birmingham’s rightly disallowed goal and the blatant handball for the penalty. No wonder referees are so maligned, as they’re not judged on decisions in law, they’re judged on what Sky want the decision to be based on their desired storyline and that dictates the narrative.

They also ignored a fan trying to punch Taylor in the head during their coverage. Wouldn’t want to upset Tom Brady on Day 1. They broadcasted live from St Andrews as they couldn’t wait to talk to the Americans in the flesh. Usually they just broadcast from a studio in London. It’s embarrassing really.
 
What's wrong with some on here, if he doesn't say wonderful things about Sunderland then so what, if he said oh joyous Sunderland this oh beautiful Sunderland that on a match involving Sunderland he would be accused of bias, he has to be neutral, give good and bad feedback, imo I like him and loved him when he played for us.
He's not neutral...that's the issue with him
 
What's wrong with some on here, if he doesn't say wonderful things about Sunderland then so what, if he said oh joyous Sunderland this oh beautiful Sunderland that on a match involving Sunderland he would be accused of bias, he has to be neutral, give good and bad feedback, imo I like him and loved him when he played for us.
Good post marra
Met him once ( after he retired ) and was very positive about us
 
He was a disgrace last night he really was. Sky as a whole have now allowed their coverage to become dominated by what would be the best story rather than the live action. They were gagging for “Tom Brady’s Birmingham overturn Ipswich, a Premier League side from last year, on return to Championship” As a result they didn’t commentate properly on a blatant foul that lead to Birmingham’s rightly disallowed goal and the blatant handball for the penalty. No wonder referees are so maligned, as they’re not judged on decisions in law, they’re judged on what Sky want the decision to be based on their desired storyline and that dictates the narrative.

They also ignored a fan trying to punch Taylor in the head during their coverage. Wouldn’t want to upset Tom Brady on Day 1. They broadcasted live from St Andrews as they couldn’t wait to talk to the Americans in the flesh. Usually they just broadcast from a studio in London. It’s embarrassing really.

This. Birmingham striker barged Greaves under the ball and Goodman spouted crap. Has a narrative in his head and his commentary doesn't bear resemblance to what is happening. Same with Hinchcliffe.
 
Reckoned the penalty was harsh even though Dykes pretty much stopped it dead with his hand. :lol:
Was genuinely wondering if there had been some sort of rule change given the amount of people on here who were going on as if it was an outrageously bad decision. His arm was in nothing like a natural position

Getting back to Goodman, he was abysmal last night. Was very obvious within the first 5 minutes of the game that he/Sky were desperate for a Birmingham win
 
Back
Top