• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

David Gower

Status
Not open for further replies.

TopCat said:
So, yes then?
Click to expand...

No, absolutely not.

chunkylover53 said:
Any need?

We know you hate female commentators but you’re being so selective here. TMS is full of chat about anything. That’s it’s thing. From buses to pigeons to cakes
Click to expand...

Any need to call me a liar? When you don’t even know me?

I’m being anything but selective in actual fact, because I’m commenting on something I have heard.

I cannot possibly comment on something I haven’t heard.
 
Last edited:
brandon said:
No, absolutely not.



Any need to call me a liar? When you don’t even know me?

I’m being anything but selective in actual fact, because I’m commenting on something I have heard.

I cannot possibly comment on something I haven’t heard.
Click to expand...
You’re really defensive about this for some reason

I await your criticism of TMS at the end of every over from now on
 
brandon said:
You can’t possibly say that.

I wasn’t listening when Agnew was talking yesterday, I was at work. So I cannot comment on it. I did however listen this morning to Guha talking bollocks about what she is wearing.
Click to expand...
Well done the BBC and their public service.

Saves me being charged £2.99 to ring up and find out what a women is wearing
 
Pink Panther said:
I was just about to post the same.
Blowers' detail was superb, nobody cared if it was the number 42 bus or not it was the picture he painted.
Click to expand...

Painting the picture of what’s going on infront of him on the field or in the stands is fine.

What we don’t need is what the commentators are wearing.

Pink Panther said:
Out of interest, what has she got on?
Click to expand...

Not a clue, I zoned out.

pavarotti1980 said:
Well done the BBC and their public service.

Saves me being charged £2.99 to ring up and find out what a women is wearing
Click to expand...

I suppose there are some places where you’d pay good money to find that out :lol:

TopCat said:
The evidence suggests otherwise
Click to expand...

What evidence is that then? Enlighten me.

chunkylover53 said:
You’re really defensive about this for some reason

I await your criticism of TMS at the end of every over from now on
Click to expand...

Defensive because I won’t comment on something I didn’t hear?! :rolleyes:

Think that’s pretty fair.

You’ll be waiting a while, I’m watching it on the telly now and enjoying the excellent David Gower.
 
Last edited:
brandon said:
Painting the picture of what’s going on infront of him on the field or in the stands is fine.

What we don’t need is what the commentators are wearing.



Not a clue, I zoned out.



I suppose there are some places where you’d pay good money to find that out :lol:



What evidence is that then? Enlighten me.



Defensive because I won’t comment on something I didn’t hear?! :rolleyes:

Think that’s pretty fair.

You’ll be waiting a while, I’m watching it on the telly now and enjoying the excellent David Gower.
Click to expand...
You’re talking nonsense. We understand

Bye
From the “f***ing wanker”
 
brandon said:
What evidence is that then? Enlighten me.
Click to expand...

You slag off a female presenter for "rambling on about" what she was wearing until it is pointed out that 2 male presenters had the same conversation. Your reply states you aren't interested in talking about the male presenters, reserving your ire for the female presenter. You don't think women should be commentating on cricket
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top