• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

County Cricket 2022

Malan has moved to 3 from 5 today

wonder if that is signifcaint

people like Pope should really be batting 3 for their counties like
From the looks of it Karunaratne isn’t playing so everyone is just shuffling up one. Don’t think there’s anything major in that one.
 

Really hope they go for Parkinson over Leach
We know what leach brings, Parkinson needs the chance, both can play in winter tbf
Listened to the wisden podcast and they were saying theyd have bairstow in their team at 5 or 7 with the gloves BUT couldnt pick him for the 1st test as he would have played 0 1st class games whilst Brooks is averaging 150+ and Bohannon is in form (bad time to fail today) and Foakes averaging over 100.
Basically saying county form needs to be rewarded.
They had sibley and lees opening with Crawley at 3 saying Bohannon needed more 100s to merit being picked.
 
Last edited:
Apologies. Thought you were advocating moving Malan to 5.

Stand by my comment that the top 7 should be Lees, Crawley, Malan, Root, Brook, Stokes and Foakes.


Back in contention for me albeit not for the NZ series.

Bairstow for foakes and I wouldn’t disagree

We have to pick bairstow with a long tail like will have
Apologies. Thought you were advocating moving Malan to 5.

Stand by my comment that the top 7 should be Lees, Crawley, Malan, Root, Brook, Stokes and Foakes.


Back in contention for me albeit not for the NZ series.

Jennings should have opened in india I maintain that, just pick him in Asia he’s quality there
 
Bairstow for foakes and I wouldn’t disagree

We have to pick bairstow with a long tail like will have


Jennings should have opened in india I maintain that, just pick him in Asia he’s quality there

Bairstow is off playing franchise somewhere, I believe? He's only got a few days turnaround before the first test. No red ball cricket and Foakes is the man in possesion. Easy enough decision unless injury or an absolute calamity from BF in the 1st test forces a change.

Agree with your point on Jennings. An Indian/Asian tour would see him truly considered.
 
Bairstow is off playing franchise somewhere, I believe? He's only got a few days turnaround before the first test. No red ball cricket and Foakes is the man in possesion. Easy enough decision unless injury or an absolute calamity from BF in the 1st test forces a change.

Agree with your point on Jennings. An Indian/Asian tour would see him truly considered.

He is but he can adjust, 2 100s in his last 4 tests

Has to play. I think he will tbh

Aye they seem fine picking bowlers just for Asian tours but not batsmsn. Never understand that
 
He is but he can adjust, 2 100s in his last 4 tests

Has to play. I think he will tbh

Aye they seem fine picking bowlers just for Asian tours but not batsmsn. Never understand that

I can't see them selecting Bairstow for the 1st test mind. If Foakes has a howler, then fair enough bring him in but otherwise I see no reason to make the change.
 
I can't see them selecting Bairstow for the 1st test mind. If Foakes has a howler, then fair enough bring him in but otherwise I see no reason to make the change.

Jonny is already in the team remember

So you’d be bringing in Brook for one of them in theory
 
We know what leach brings, Parkinson needs the chance, both can play in winter tbf
Listened to the wisden podcast and they were saying theyd have bairstow in their team at 5 or 7 with the gloves BUT couldnt pick him for the 1st test as he would have played 0 1st class games whilst Brooks is averaging 150+ and Bohannon is in form (bad time to fail today) and Foakes averaging over 100.
Basically saying county form needs to be rewarded.
They had sibley and lees opening with Crawley at 3 saying Bohannon needed more 100s to merit being picked.
Selecting Parkinson will send the right message imo that they looking to select a spinner to take wickets rather than one to just tie a end up.

It may not work but we need to brave with selection and take a risk or two, we will have a very good seam attack so think we can afford to take a little risk with the spinner
 
Last edited:
Jonny is already in the team remember

So you’d be bringing in Brook for one of them in theory

Indeed. However, are we veering towards JB being in the side without the gloves? Not for me. So, at it stands yes, Brook comes in for Jonny. Unlucky, as he has been at times for this test side.
 
Good start to the season for Foakes, would be looking at Bairstow, Stokes and Foakes as our 5-7 with the number 3 slot and an opening position up for grabs. Brook couldn't have done anymore but we don't really need another number 5 at the moment.
 
Back
Top