GordonMuchallNo1Fan
Striker
You must be logged on to see external links
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You must be logged on to see external links
WOW!!! thats really worrying, how on earth do counties survive thatIt costs between £10,000 and £15,000 per day to stage a County Championship match at Sophia Gardens.
Membership contributes just 2% of the club’s annual income.
WOW!!! thats really worrying, how on earth do counties survive that
id be interested to see what Durhams costs were, but no business can survive that
Indeed-The agreement in the sell off is that investors claim 80% of any profit and ECB the remaining 20% . Given that these investors have an 8-4 majority over ECB on the Hundred board,clearly it's within their power to increase that discrepancy even further.Great news for the investors in the 16.4.
This is why I don’t buy memberships anymore.Next proposal dropping to 13s CC games with a complete mess deciding on how that will work.
Nobody will get relegated this year for starters. So hope for us yet
You must be logged on to see external links
Past the paywall
You must be logged on to see external links
If they want to play less cricket, reduce their wages pro rata. Soft shites.Let us consider the prime argument offered for a reduction in the cricketing schedule-i.e. Players'workload. The total number of days currently allocated to cricket is
CC 14x4=56
T2014x1=14
1D/H8x1=8
Grand total of 78 days but short form cricket lasts <4hrs and very few, if any, players will be involved in all games in all tournaments. Additionally very few,if any, players,will be actively involved throughout all 4 days of a CC game.The current cricket season is spread over 176 days.
That equates to a 3 day week,outdoors in generally pleasant conditions.
Mental and physical overload -tell that to the general workforce -either white or blue collar.
It's as hideous and fallacious argument as Franchise cricket being the saviour of the game.
I just looked at thd county season 1985 to compare as an example. You had the County Championship, Benson & Hedges cup, Natwest Trophy and Sunday League. I worked it out as 95 days of cricket as a minimum per team and that would also be more hours of cricket played e.g. 60 overs games vs 20 over games.Let us consider the prime argument offered for a reduction in the cricketing schedule-i.e. Players'workload. The total number of days currently allocated to cricket is
CC 14x4=56
T2014x1=14
1D/H8x1=8
Grand total of 78 days but short form cricket lasts <4hrs and very few, if any, players will be involved in all games in all tournaments. Additionally very few,if any, players,will be actively involved throughout all 4 days of a CC game.The current cricket season is spread over 176 days.
That equates to a 3 day week,outdoors in generally pleasant conditions.
Mental and physical overload -tell that to the general workforce -either white or blue collar.
It's as hideous and fallacious argument as Franchise cricket being the saviour of the game.
Imagine a worker on the production line at Nissan suggesting to management that the number of cars they are being asked to produce is affecting their health.Let us consider the prime argument offered for a reduction in the cricketing schedule-i.e. Players'workload. The total number of days currently allocated to cricket is
CC 14x4=56
T2014x1=14
1D/H8x1=8
Grand total of 78 days but short form cricket lasts <4hrs and very few, if any, players will be involved in all games in all tournaments. Additionally very few,if any, players,will be actively involved throughout all 4 days of a CC game.The current cricket season is spread over 176 days.
That equates to a 3 day week,outdoors in generally pleasant conditions.
Mental and physical overload -tell that to the general workforce -either white or blue collar.
It's as hideous and fallacious argument as Franchise cricket being the saviour of the game.
Latest from the Cricketer newsletter.
It appears that the required majority to elicit reduction will not be obtained. The response from Bostock and his 2 fellow CEOs on the committee recommending the reduction is to suggest that the players' union go on strike because of the impasse. Toys out of the pram reaction.
And they're running English cricket.
Or ruining English cricket?