kildaremackem
Striker
why would they ouvote him? they get the benfits of the moeny spentThe essence of it is for me: if KLD wants to (for example) spend money on re-laying the pitch, can he be outvoted?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why would they ouvote him? they get the benfits of the moeny spentThe essence of it is for me: if KLD wants to (for example) spend money on re-laying the pitch, can he be outvoted?
So can you confirm we don’t have a bunch of fans who have people lined up to get rid of all of the time? Like one scapegoat after another wanting them to get sacked ? Players, coaches, managers, DOF’s, shareholders, owners. I think you just implied this doesn’t happen did you ?No we have fans who don’t want to be misled all the time. The bad feeling has been caused by these owners
End of your story maybe. I agree with the last line which is why he maybe shouldn’t be there not why he should. But I simply don’t agree. The demanded thing isn’t always the right thing.He should be there, end of story like. The place is going mental and he's possibly nashed off. The club should be calming the situation and not just ignoring the pertinent questions being answered by the right people.
It's not fair to put people like Chris waters there tonight when he can't answer the questions people are there for. I understand he's always there but KLD should have attended, even if on zoom.So can you confirm we don’t have a bunch of fans who have people lined up to get rid of all of the time? Like one scapegoat after another wanting them to get sacked ? Players, coaches, managers, DOF’s, shareholders, owners. I think you just implied this doesn’t happen did you ?
(Not saying I don’t agree with some btw)
End of your story maybe. I agree with the last line which is why he maybe shouldn’t be there not why he should. But I simply don’t agree. The demanded thing isn’t always the right thing.
We disagree on this which is fine. Chris Waters will field questions, not answer detailed questions about share voting issuesIt's not fair to put people like Chris waters there tonight when he can't answer the questions people are there for. I understand he's always there but KLD should have attended, even if on zoom.
How?There'll be outrage here but in all honesty we knew this anyway.
How?
Chris Waters is one of the best at this club, I’ll wager hundreds of us have his mobile from one thing or another as well.We disagree on this which is fine. Chris Waters will field questions, not answer detailed questions about share voting issues
When did KLD lie? Tried to read up but have not found itGlad to know. Now we can get back to hounding the wankers out. Nowhere to hide now. I’m a bit gutted KLD was happy to lie for them.
I thought he would have 51% at very worst. The lunatics are still controlling the asylum, no wonder we haven’t seen any money be invested
Yes but hard to knowWhat came to light yesterday had already been widely speculated on here for a while.
So what do you think all this noise over share percentages will achieve? Other than bad feelings.
This ^, but we have a noisy section of fans who just seem to want to get rid of one person after another.
why would they ouvote him? they get the benfits of the moeny spent
Fuck all's changed. Recruitment has been shite, the first team is garbage 5 wins from 17 away from home, the DoF has proven himself to be out of his depth and a complete coward into the bargain. South Shields wouldn't play on that pitch. Ownership group still 59% the Madrox failures. On the plus side they did put the prices up though and got folks to renew on the back of being misled about a takeover.He’s sitting smiling and laughing with Methven after he called him an asset stripper. I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t scream “things starting to change” for me. Just look at the stage of the pitch.
the did spend it a bit..i mean they always wanted to spend it over multiple years..i suspect they had to spend more of it during the pandemic than they ex[ected to..and now..want out..notice in that article he said they will have funded the club to the tune of £21m by the end of this season..which is around what the para moneybwas?So why didn’t they spend it while they were here, or do they just want others (KLD) to spend the majority
There's a lot of sense in this. I don't want kld gone. I do think he needs to start being more open with the fans though, which is exactly what he said he'd be when he bought in. As others have mentioned, my main nagging doubt is why he didn't buy 100%. Donald couldn't afford to run us, especially due to covid. He'd want to keep a piece to try and cash in later but could he really demand that? Why wouldn't kld just pull out of the deal and wait a few months until Donald was more desperate? Not as if there was a queue of likely buyers. I'll feel more comfortable if he gets 100%. I certainly don't think there should be any sort of campaign for him to leaveI'm pleased the percentages have been revealed as I think fans should know who owns any club and despite my Friday night Twitter snipes at Chris Witherspoon, I'm pleased his work paid off on that specific point.
But from this precise point onwards I would urge caution from fans and fanzines.
There are grass shoots of recovery under Kyril as Chairman. The last thing this club needs now is to be put into stasis for a potentially long period while the complete set of current owners try to find a new set. This is not a crisis club. We are not heading to administration. Theres been some good recruitment behind the scenes that hasn't even bedded in yet, only this last week the club have installed a very expensive hybrid pitch.
Removing Madrox is one thing I'm sure we ALL agree on. Removing Kyril is quite another in my mind. There is a good argument that things are slowly beginning to change under whatever power he currently has.
So I'd say that the fans, the fanzines and the local media that influence the fanbase need to be very clear on what they are angry about specifically and what they want, as a mass hanging could do more harm than good.
the did spend it a bit..i mean they always wanted to spend it over multiple years..i suspect they had to spend more of it during the pandemic than they ex[ected to..and now..want out..notice in that article he said they will have funded the club to the tune of £21m by the end of this season..which is around what the para moneybwas?
Signed off on a years worth of comms that intentionally conflated the terms largest and majority shareholder.When did KLD lie? Tried to read up but have not found it
Yes but hard to know
I really dislike the chancers
That depends how the 9 million loan is included / not included. Apart from that, i don’t believe a word he says
The £9m came into the club as increase in share capital during the 19/20 season.