D
Deleted member 26533
Guest
Mentioned in the "Carbophobes" thread as to why I don't like the term "clean foods" and I feel compelled to expand on that so people don't take it out of context and believe I'm condoning just smashing home like 10 snickers bars a day.
My first issue is that clean foods don't have any real definition. Somebody that is on a keto diet is going to have a completely different perspective of a "clean food" than somebody who isn't on keto generally has. Somebody that follows a Paleo diet is going to have a different definition of a clean food and so on.
Something I mentioned in that thread is that I don't believe you can take a food in isolation and lable it as 'clean' or just a 'good' food no matter what, because you have to look at the diet as a whole. You look at a diet and say "Well, that diet is not healthy because...".
The way you should look at specific foods is by the content. Look at a food and say for example; "this food has a good amino acid profile" or "this food is void of micronutrients" as opposed to just "it's a clean food", because your food doesn't recognise what people label clean, it recognises the nutrients within a food.
I also find that people that limit themselves to only a certain number of 'clean' foods are not taking in a sufficient variety of micronutrients and they're also the most likely to go and binge, because they've limitted thmselves to such a crappy, boring food intake with the belief that these 'clean' foods are magic.
Hope that makes sense and I appreciate I've probably waffled and likely left out something as I'm watching the match at the same time and not giving it full attention.
My first issue is that clean foods don't have any real definition. Somebody that is on a keto diet is going to have a completely different perspective of a "clean food" than somebody who isn't on keto generally has. Somebody that follows a Paleo diet is going to have a different definition of a clean food and so on.
Something I mentioned in that thread is that I don't believe you can take a food in isolation and lable it as 'clean' or just a 'good' food no matter what, because you have to look at the diet as a whole. You look at a diet and say "Well, that diet is not healthy because...".
The way you should look at specific foods is by the content. Look at a food and say for example; "this food has a good amino acid profile" or "this food is void of micronutrients" as opposed to just "it's a clean food", because your food doesn't recognise what people label clean, it recognises the nutrients within a food.
I also find that people that limit themselves to only a certain number of 'clean' foods are not taking in a sufficient variety of micronutrients and they're also the most likely to go and binge, because they've limitted thmselves to such a crappy, boring food intake with the belief that these 'clean' foods are magic.
Hope that makes sense and I appreciate I've probably waffled and likely left out something as I'm watching the match at the same time and not giving it full attention.
Last edited by a moderator: