Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Chelsea’s were iirc 18-26 yrs of age and liverpools 16-34? probably whatever age VvD is? Depending which combi of players were on the pitch at any given time the youngest XI varied throughout the game.How the fuck has it been portrayed Liverpool had a team full of kids win it like? Scousers are a different breed.
His problem is that he doesn’t take the FAC & FLC seriously. He doesn’t take them seriously because they don’t appear on the radar of the power brokers at Real, Atleti, Bayern, Juve, Inter, AC Milan etc.He's a serial loser isn't he?
Don't think we're ready to sack Carrick just yetRebuild he reputation at a championship sleeping giant imo
Saw a video on that. About 2 actually came through Liverpools academy permanently. Rest were poached from elsewhere still at young ages mind 15-16 etc but not all full blooded Scousers as the media would have you believe.
I'm sure the winger on the bench was one of ours.
yepDid he blank the owner when he went to collect his medal? Looked that way to me.
He looked a broken man at the end. I thought that’s a man who knows his times up. Plus he knows there’s only so many times you can fail to land a trophy at a big club before you stop being taken seriously by the big clubs, big players and media
Sky always go overboard/over hype everythingGary Neville and Carragher had me believing klopp had to pick some 16yr olds out of the crowd to make the numbers up.
Also a fair point. Chelsea have signed a whole host of absolute shit. They just happen to be young shite.
Sky went overboard with their representation of the narrative though.
I hope he says the latter, which would be fair enough. Nobody would expect him to necessarily know PSG's trophy historySo are you saying that PSG are not a big club or that you didn't know that Pochettino actually won the League and French Cup when he was at PSG.
You win nowt with kids. Guess they've never heard that expression !
Chelsea actually had a younger team on the pitch.
Can they even afford to sack him? bet he’s on a healthy contract.He looked a broken man at the end. I thought that’s a man who knows his times up. Plus he knows there’s only so many times you can fail to land a trophy at a big club before you stop being taken seriously by the big clubs, big players and media
Chelsea seem to be the new Sunderland for managers. IE it doesn’t matter how badly you fail because EVERYONE fails there.Can they even afford to sack him? bet he’s on a healthy contract.
Still I suppose he ain’t gonna be worrying about reputational damage that Todd boehly whalloper must have thought footballers were a dying breed, Best Buy em all
Thought the same.Yeah I noticed that, looked like a man that knows he’s getting the sack
It’s a sweet deal though, sign a big fat contract, try and make sense of the madness for a year or two, sit on ur arse for the remainder of your fat ass contract on gardening leave.Chelsea seem to be the new Sunderland for managers. IE it doesn’t matter how badly you fail because EVERYONE fails there.
The fawning media were mainly responsible.How the fuck has it been portrayed Liverpool had a team full of kids win it like? Scousers are a different breed.
Reminds me of another clubGary Neville and Carragher had me believing klopp had to pick some 16yr olds out of the crowd to make the numbers up.
Also a fair point. Chelsea have signed a whole host of absolute shit. They just happen to be young shite.
Sky went overboard with their representation of the narrative though.