Stick to painting the fence. He doesn't have to prove he is innocent, if there isn't enough evidence to prove him guilty , he is innocent .Sorry, fence can wait five mins.
No, no, no, no, no. No times a million and again no. It doesn't work like that. This isn't a Hollywood movie.
He was unable to prove his innocence. Fact. The jury were unable to prove that he was guilty beyond reasonable doubt. That is not the same as innocent. Not my words. The words of the law.
Look, I f**king hate The Sun but, unbelievably, they have a very good wrapping up of the whole shoddy affair from a barrister.
You must be logged on to see external links
Also gives a lot more background to the sordid affair which, if you were right-minded enough to consider it, shows why we mustn't go anywhere near this person.