• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

CC : Worcesrershire vs Durham

Thought i'd put in here to avoid another blaydon races thread but


Counties are considering the possibility of playing short-form cricket under the names of their local football and rugby clubs as they prepare to vote on the future of the Hundred.
As revealed by The Times, the controversial 100-ball tournament could be entirely scrapped and replaced with a county-based competition, played in a football league-style pyramid, as ECB officials grapple with the long-term future of the Hundred and the increasing pressure on budgets.
The ECB will present county chiefs with a number of options for the direction of the men’s competition next month, which include: keeping the Hundred as it is with the eight existing teams; increasing it to a ten-team tournament to include a team based around Taunton/Bristol and a team based in Durham; or getting rid of the eight existing teams and replacing them with county-based teams in a larger competition to be played in a league system, with promotion and relegation.

The proposals will also include ideas about garnering private investment into either the existing Hundred by selling equity in the teams, or a new model whereby the 18 first-class counties — or all 39 first-class and National (formerly minor) counties — can bring in their own private investment.
There have already been discussions between some counties and their local football or rugby club that could lead to counties playing under different names in an attempt to harness other local sports fans. For example, Sussex could play as Brighton & Hove Albion or Durham as Newcastle United.:eek::eek::eek::eek:
One area up for discussion will be whether it is sensible to continue having two short-form competitions: the T20 Blast and the Hundred. Some counties have noticed a negative knock-on impact on their Blast ticket sales because it has been squeezed into a shorter time period, meaning more games being played on the traditionally difficult to sell evenings of Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.
English cricket is facing financial pressures and these will be substantially increased when the ECB announces an equality and diversity action plan next week in response to the recommendations made by the Independent Commission for Equity in Cricket this year.
The action plan will contain a number of areas of work to improve equality in the sport but they come with a , which, combined with the costs of giving women cricketers the as the men and the pressure to increase the value of central contracts to combat the threat from franchise leagues, means the ECB is under significant financial pressure.
 

Improved scene…

You must be logged on to see media items
Sounds like it’s going to be entertaining.

You must be logged on to see media items

It would appear they were all talk :rolleyes:
The run rate of the two in at the moment suggests they're in no hurry. Bizarre
Beat me to it, but yeah, exactly. Doesn’t appear that they have any play really. They need to have an eye on the fact that Leicestershire are motoring along at Grace Road.
Thought i'd put in here to avoid another blaydon races thread but


Counties are considering the possibility of playing short-form cricket under the names of their local football and rugby clubs as they prepare to vote on the future of the Hundred.
As revealed by The Times, the controversial 100-ball tournament could be entirely scrapped and replaced with a county-based competition, played in a football league-style pyramid, as ECB officials grapple with the long-term future of the Hundred and the increasing pressure on budgets.
The ECB will present county chiefs with a number of options for the direction of the men’s competition next month, which include: keeping the Hundred as it is with the eight existing teams; increasing it to a ten-team tournament to include a team based around Taunton/Bristol and a team based in Durham; or getting rid of the eight existing teams and replacing them with county-based teams in a larger competition to be played in a league system, with promotion and relegation.

The proposals will also include ideas about garnering private investment into either the existing Hundred by selling equity in the teams, or a new model whereby the 18 first-class counties — or all 39 first-class and National (formerly minor) counties — can bring in their own private investment.
There have already been discussions between some counties and their local football or rugby club that could lead to counties playing under different names in an attempt to harness other local sports fans. For example, Sussex could play as Brighton & Hove Albion or Durham as Newcastle United.:eek::eek::eek::eek:
One area up for discussion will be whether it is sensible to continue having two short-form competitions: the T20 Blast and the Hundred. Some counties have noticed a negative knock-on impact on their Blast ticket sales because it has been squeezed into a shorter time period, meaning more games being played on the traditionally difficult to sell evenings of Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.
English cricket is facing financial pressures and these will be substantially increased when the ECB announces an equality and diversity action plan next week in response to the recommendations made by the Independent Commission for Equity in Cricket this year.
The action plan will contain a number of areas of work to improve equality in the sport but they come with a , which, combined with the costs of giving women cricketers the as the men and the pressure to increase the value of central contracts to combat the threat from franchise leagues, means the ECB is under significant financial pressure.

Surely that’s just a delayed April Fool… That’s an even more braindead idea than the f*cking 16.4 :rolleyes:.
 
Last edited:
Thought i'd put in here to avoid another blaydon races thread but


Counties are considering the possibility of playing short-form cricket under the names of their local football and rugby clubs as they prepare to vote on the future of the Hundred.
As revealed by The Times, the controversial 100-ball tournament could be entirely scrapped and replaced with a county-based competition, played in a football league-style pyramid, as ECB officials grapple with the long-term future of the Hundred and the increasing pressure on budgets.
The ECB will present county chiefs with a number of options for the direction of the men’s competition next month, which include: keeping the Hundred as it is with the eight existing teams; increasing it to a ten-team tournament to include a team based around Taunton/Bristol and a team based in Durham; or getting rid of the eight existing teams and replacing them with county-based teams in a larger competition to be played in a league system, with promotion and relegation.

The proposals will also include ideas about garnering private investment into either the existing Hundred by selling equity in the teams, or a new model whereby the 18 first-class counties — or all 39 first-class and National (formerly minor) counties — can bring in their own private investment.
There have already been discussions between some counties and their local football or rugby club that could lead to counties playing under different names in an attempt to harness other local sports fans. For example, Sussex could play as Brighton & Hove Albion or Durham as Newcastle United.:eek::eek::eek::eek:
One area up for discussion will be whether it is sensible to continue having two short-form competitions: the T20 Blast and the Hundred. Some counties have noticed a negative knock-on impact on their Blast ticket sales because it has been squeezed into a shorter time period, meaning more games being played on the traditionally difficult to sell evenings of Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.
English cricket is facing financial pressures and these will be substantially increased when the ECB announces an equality and diversity action plan next week in response to the recommendations made by the Independent Commission for Equity in Cricket this year.
The action plan will contain a number of areas of work to improve equality in the sport but they come with a , which, combined with the costs of giving women cricketers the as the men and the pressure to increase the value of central contracts to combat the threat from franchise leagues, means the ECB is under significant financial pressure.
cant see that happening surely, biggest worry is that if its a bidding war between us and them, a few quid to back a cricket team is down the back of the sofa money for the sportswashers
seems mental youd alienate an entire fanbase like that though
 
Last edited:
It would appear they were all talk :rolleyes:

Beat me to it, but yeah, exactly. Doesn’t appear that they have any play really. They need to have an eye on the fact that Leicestershire are motoring along at Grace Road.


Surely that’s just a delayed April Fool… That’s an even more braindead idea than the f*cking 16.4 :rolleyes:.
cant see that happening surely, biggest worry is that if its a bidding war between us and them, a few quid to back a cricket team is down the back of the sofa money for the sportswashers
Sussex might be the only place where it might get some traction. Leicester maybe. Not here or in Manchester or Birmingham or Yorkshire or London or even Hampshire. Lancs rebranding as Man U. That'll go well.
 
April 1st????

Dear me. soeone should mention how sucessful Sporting Club Newcastle was and how strong local ice hockey is now compared to what it wass then.
 
April 1st????

Dear me. soeone should mention how sucessful Sporting Club Newcastle was and how strong local ice hockey is now compared to what it wass then.
Don't get me started on the ice hockey. It's taken me 27 years since Durham went to take it in again and start watching Billingham.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bri
Sussex might be the only place where it might get some traction. Leicester maybe. Not here or in Manchester or Birmingham or Yorkshire or London or even Hampshire. Lancs rebranding as Man U. That'll go well.

Barely any county would see the ‘footballification’ of cricket working. The majority are split in 2 and some cases 3 or more. It’s utter utter lunacy.
Off for rain 179/4 or 5 if Hose cannot bat

Leicestershire have suffered a collapse unfortunately which means that Worcestershire won’t feel too rushed to force the issue in our game. That said, a result at Leicester one way or the other is certainly looking very likely.
 
Last edited:
Thought i'd put in here to avoid another blaydon races thread but


Counties are considering the possibility of playing short-form cricket under the names of their local football and rugby clubs as they prepare to vote on the future of the Hundred.
As revealed by The Times, the controversial 100-ball tournament could be entirely scrapped and replaced with a county-based competition, played in a football league-style pyramid, as ECB officials grapple with the long-term future of the Hundred and the increasing pressure on budgets.
The ECB will present county chiefs with a number of options for the direction of the men’s competition next month, which include: keeping the Hundred as it is with the eight existing teams; increasing it to a ten-team tournament to include a team based around Taunton/Bristol and a team based in Durham; or getting rid of the eight existing teams and replacing them with county-based teams in a larger competition to be played in a league system, with promotion and relegation.

The proposals will also include ideas about garnering private investment into either the existing Hundred by selling equity in the teams, or a new model whereby the 18 first-class counties — or all 39 first-class and National (formerly minor) counties — can bring in their own private investment.
There have already been discussions between some counties and their local football or rugby club that could lead to counties playing under different names in an attempt to harness other local sports fans. For example, Sussex could play as Brighton & Hove Albion or Durham as Newcastle United.:eek::eek::eek::eek:
One area up for discussion will be whether it is sensible to continue having two short-form competitions: the T20 Blast and the Hundred. Some counties have noticed a negative knock-on impact on their Blast ticket sales because it has been squeezed into a shorter time period, meaning more games being played on the traditionally difficult to sell evenings of Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.
English cricket is facing financial pressures and these will be substantially increased when the ECB announces an equality and diversity action plan next week in response to the recommendations made by the Independent Commission for Equity in Cricket this year.
The action plan will contain a number of areas of work to improve equality in the sport but they come with a , which, combined with the costs of giving women cricketers the as the men and the pressure to increase the value of central contracts to combat the threat from franchise leagues, means the ECB is under significant financial pressure.
That would be suicide for Durham, we have far more supporters from the red and white side of the divide than the black and white.

The tiny positive in there is that Durham look like getting a side in this one way or another.
 
Would need to skittle Yorkshire for 155 or less again you'd imagine for them to do that.

26 ahead and 9 down. Mind when you posted they might have been 6 down.

Now have a lead of 40 and are still batting.

One thing is for sure, that game is a lot closer to a result than ours is. If Leicestershire take early wickets they’re massive favourites and Worcestershire’s hand may well be forced.

Inspection at 14:50 at New Road.
 
Now have a lead of 40 and are still batting.

One thing is for sure, that game is a lot closer to a result than ours is. If Leicestershire take early wickets they’re massive favourites and Worcestershire’s hand may well be forced.

Inspection at 14:50 at New Road.
Just been watching some of that. The Yorkshire commentator is not a happy man with their performance :lol: 212-9
 
Back
Top