• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

CC :: Notts v Durham


..

still jet leading, cloth cap second

8 fences left
..

jet is about 8 lengths clear all the way
..

cloth cap pulled up the favourite
..

the winner is minella times, ridden by a woman has won. First time ever

11/1
..

2 balle de flow

3 any second now

4 borough saint

5 farclas. I’ve got that ew . Woohoo
 
Last edited:
Durham 180-4 (50.2 overs) 100 partnership up off just 126 balls. Lead is 243.

Bedingham 115* (152), Eckersley 32 (57).
Hit it back to Fletcher and Fletcher threw the ball at him. Looked like the ump said "steady on son" as he walked past but deserved more
.
100 partnership

This is good stuff here
He should’ve been warned, cause the same bloke did it in the first innings too. Think Burnham was batting at the time.
 
Last edited:
This is setting up nicely for a quick thrash in the morning, declare an hour before lunch and hopefully the new ball, will work it’s magic, like it’s done all match.
..


forecast not too bad for Sunday
Durham 180-4 (50.2 overs) 100 partnership up off just 126 balls. Lead is 243.

Bedingham 115* (152), Eckersley 32 (57).

He should’ve been warned, cause the same bloke did it in the first innings too. Think Burnham was batting at the time.
Question for you @brandon

when was the last time we played ESSEX home or away in the championship?
 
Last edited:
This is setting up nicely for a quick thrash in the morning, declare an hour before lunch and hopefully the new ball, will work it’s magic, like it’s done all match.
..


forecast not too bad for Sunday

Question for you @brandon

when was the last time we played ESSEX home or away in the championship?
I mentioned this when the groups were announced - 2010 and before that 2005.
 
Last edited:
Durham 180-4 (50.2 overs) 100 partnership up off just 126 balls. Lead is 243.

Bedingham 115* (152), Eckersley 32 (57).

He should’ve been warned, cause the same bloke did it in the first innings too. Think Burnham was batting at the time.
You're right. Marty reckoned it contributed to Burnham getting out a couple of balls later. He's a nasty fat bastard with a face that could turn milk.
 
Back
Top