• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

CC :: Durham v Nottinghamshire


You must be logged on to see media items

Lees back

not easy picking or predicting the XI out of that. gibson/salisbury has to play. trevaskis should play, so should jones but really only one of them can.

lees, dickson, peterson, borthwick, bedingham, eckersley, trevaskis, raine, potts, rushworth, gibson

salisbury, drissel and a very pissed off jones left out

edit: but it wouldn't surprise us in the slightest if jones is in ahead of trevaskis
 
Can people who know more about stuff tell me why Luke Doneathy is not around the squad?

Looked a decent local takent in the 50 over stuff, the type we should be pushing

is he really not capable of 4 day runs? or just a bit too early?
bowling too obviously
He won't play ahead of trev

Hope not, local talent needs to be pushed
 
Last edited:
Can people who know more about stuff tell me why Luke Doneathy is not around the squad?

Looked a decent local takent in the 50 over stuff, the type we should be pushing

is he really not capable of 4 day runs? or just a bit too early?
bowling too obviously


Hope not, local talent needs to be pushed
Play whoever is deemed better
 
We have enough big names in the side like, we need some local lads in there too


Glad you agree
I’m also happy them developing in the seconds etc, over the years managed to play against some good players thanks to this.

It is good to see a breakthrough local
Player of course it is. But it’s also good to play against them.
 
You only need local players if they are good enough would you rather jack diamond in the Sunderland team or someone more talented

Eh? What on earth has football got to do with it

Durham need to play young lads when they are not full developed as the ready made county pros, as they have done their/our whole existence

Potts the latest example to benefit from that and now looks quality
 
Eh? What on earth has football got to do with it

Durham need to play young lads when they are not full developed as the ready made county pros, as they have done their/our whole existence

Potts the latest example to benefit from that and now looks quality
Well you prefer playing younger players because they are local rather than playing better players
 
I’m also happy them developing in the seconds etc, over the years managed to play against some good players thanks to this.

It is good to see a breakthrough local
Player of course it is. But it’s also good to play against them.

Aye just think you need to give people game time it’s how they improve

Trev needs to play every game for me and just bowl and bat

We have some good players in the side now but would be a step too far bringing in drissel for me
Well you prefer playing younger players because they are local rather than playing better players
You’re so boring like

Aye for Durham, that’s why it exists and why’ve we produced so many good cricketers

Young players get better by playing you know
 
Aye just think you need to give people game time it’s how they improve

Trev needs to play every game for me and just bowl and bat

We have some good players in the side now but would be a step too far bringing in drissel for me

You’re so boring like

Aye for Durham, that’s why it exists and why’ve we produced so many good cricketers

Young players get better by playing you know
I'm not saying don't play them but why not in football as well and not to detriment of team if better are available
 
We need some local lads playing regularly. Great to see the likes of Potts doing well. Obviously Doneathy did well in the 50 over last season, great to see. Likewise Bushnell and many others. Brings a lot of satisfaction to see local lads do well.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top