D
Deleted member 26533
Guest
What about missing meals?
I was led to believe that the body would store fat as wouldn't know when it was getting fed?
I read on that intermittent fasting too, but there is quite a lot of theories on both.
I have eaten every 2/3 hours for the last ten years, but that's due to getting protein in for muscle growth
I have eaten every 2/3 hours for the last ten years, but that's due to getting protein in for muscle growth
I have eaten every 2/3 hours for the last ten years, but that's due to getting protein in for muscle growth
What about missing meals?
I was led to believe that the body would store fat as wouldn't know when it was getting fed?
I don't know what the fuck is going on with my I phone and typing this out
Sorry about the above post, not sure how that happened- when I kept trying to edit and delete , it just kept repeating what I'd put.
Phone playing up a bit there like!
The answer to the first is simply that it's just not how the body functions phyiologically and to be honest I've never heard that theory at college or degree level. For example, carbohydrates are going to be broken down and stored as glycogen, which is used as fuel for the body. It's not simply digested and stored as fat as some sort of precautionary measure against starvation.
Also, if you eat less frequently (providing you're eating the same macros and calories), the digestion rate of a larger meal is going to be slower anyway.
A quote from Alan Aragon, one of the most respected people in the industry, who seems to be continuing to get more and more regognition; http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=691054
so does skipping meals slow down your metabolism then?
No, the thermic effect of feeding is relative to the overall amount of calories you consume, not how frequently.