S
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bit generous to Bairstow ? Played in a dead rubber, whilst he gave Curran a six, who played and contributed in winning live games
As did Keats who contributed an innings of 146 which was higher than bairstows, again in a live game
Bit generous to Bairstow ? Played in a dead rubber, whilst he gave Curran a six, who played and contributed in winning live games
As did Keats who contributed an innings of 146 which was higher than bairstows, again in a live game
Jennings should get an extra point at least simply for his catching which was brilliant.
He should still be nowhere near the Ashes team though (for his weakness against good deal bowling as well as being a Saffa ).
Keats played three, scored a higher ton, took some of the best catches seen, deserves at least a mark above BairstowBairstow played 1 game and scored a 100, deserves at least an 8
Don't ge the leach rating, was our best bowler
Take it one series at a time, winning becomes a habit, nothing better for the ashes than a win in the Windies
To be fair, most openers are vulnerable against good seam bowlers in seam friendly conditions. Certainly can't think of anyone in the county circuit who is better than Jennings.Jennings should get an extra point at least simply for his catching which was brilliant.
He should still be nowhere near the Ashes team though (for his weakness against good deal bowling as well as being a Saffa ).
Keats played three, scored a higher ton, took some of the best catches seen, deserves at least a mark above Bairstow
Bairstow played once, the series was over.
Keats played three, scored a higher ton, took some of the best catches seen, deserves at least a mark above Bairstow
Bairstow played once, the series was over.
Score for Bairstow is a joke. Going off his 2018 form, I doubt he'd have scored another ton if he'd played all three games.
One game though. Imo Keats did equally well but as always it’s just a pundits opinionDon't think he could do anything about that!
He was chucked in at a unfamiliar position where he does not normally bat and scored a hundred!
I think that's impossible to know!
One game though. Imo Keats did equally well but as always it’s just a pundits opinion
The mirror today has these marks
Burns 4
Keats 7
Bairstow 9. Can’t be having that either
Root 9
Stokes 8
Buttler 8
Moeen 8
Foakes 10
Rashid 7
Broad 5
Leach 9
Curran 7
Anderson 5
Bairstow rated as the joint second most important for that one innings?
The marks can only be based across the whole series. You could give Keats a 10 based on his 146 and world class catches in that one gameI think you can only base marks of the games he played, as not his fault he did not play in the others,
Jennings managed 84 runs in his other 5 innings other than his hundred so was never going to get a really high score.
Buttler was my man of the series the way he assessed each game and wicket and adapted his game for that game situation.
Score for Bairstow is a joke. Going off his 2018 form, I doubt he'd have scored another ton if he'd played all three games.
I think that's impossible to know!