rentaghost
Striker
I don't know - the pitches over there were much more suitable to a 'Chris Woakes' than I Brydon Carse imo. Historically their pitches have been flat which is why we selected the 'point of difference' bowlers when if fact the Woakes, Anderson, Robinson types of the past would have been excellent imo,Chose might be a bit generous. Australia played sensibly in the first innings at Perth and conceded a first innings lead for the first time in a dozen matches when the ashes had been alive. England had it right. Then by the accident of Kawaja’s back they stumbled on someone who very much employed the charge at the guns strategy but got away with it/ did it better. And we never recovered.
I’ll certainly give you that.
But this. The bowlers were the difference. And the keeper and what the fact that they actually had one, and what that did to support the bowlers. Not just the extreme pace failures though. The others were found wanting as well. For obvious reasons our system generates bowlers who can bowl on English spring and autumn wickets with an English ball. For equally obvious reasons that’s fuck all use in an Australian summer.
Last edited: