• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Artemis 2 Going back to the moon.


you're quite hung up on that 92bn... best explanation...

spacex:

Logon or register to see this image


nasa:

Logon or register to see this image
NASA’s rocket is based on decades old tried and tested technology, which is ‘one’ use only, so yes it’s tried and tested.

SpaceX on the other hand are building a never before seen technology that is fully reusable, that is 4 times more powerful and are currently onto test flight 11 (this month hopefully), so yes there have been SpaceX explosions as you correctly point out, but NASA had the same mishaps while testing new technologies in the 60’s, it was just more ‘in secret’

Spacex are after the holy grail of space travel ‘reusability’, they hope to launch starship everyday in the future, blimey the falcon 9 from SpaceX currently does launch almost everyday, and some ships are heading towards 30 launches, which is incredible but proves starship is ‘possible’
 

spacex have the flexibilty to blow things up in figuring out how to put big objects into space, nasa can't do that with public money so have to take a more cautious but expensive approach to getting humans safely out of the earth atmosphere.
NASA’s rocket is based on decades old tried and tested technology, which is ‘one’ use only, so yes it’s tried and tested.
the bit that amazed me was the main core is using shuttle motors...
Approx liftoff 8 hours from now
when's crew to the pad time?
 
Last edited:
spacex have the flexibilty to blow things up in figuring out how to put big objects into space, nasa can't do that with public money so have to take a more cautious but expensive approach to getting humans safely out of the earth atmosphere.

the bit that amazed me was the main core is using shuttle motors...

when's crew to the pad time?
the solid rocket boosters on the side are basically the same as the shuttle too, just 5 segments rather than 4.
 
It’s only a few days away now, we are going back to the moon, well flying round it to prepare for ARTEMIS 3 but we are going to the moon.

1972 was the last time we went, this time there will be livestreams and cameras in 4K recording it.

Exciting times for space fans

You must be logged on to see media items
hahahahaha, April fools day
 
Im a bit behind on this but were the Apollos just in a lower orbit?

apollo 8 got to less than 100 miles from the surface, this is something like 5000 miles from what i've read... which means they'll be 1000s of miles further away from earth when they slingshot back compared to James Lovell & gang...
 
spacex have the flexibilty to blow things up in figuring out how to put big objects into space, nasa can't do that with public money so have to take a more cautious but expensive approach to getting humans safely out of the earth atmosphere.

the bit that amazed me was the main core is using shuttle motors...

when's crew to the pad time?
Couple of hours I believe from now
Im gobsmacked by the posts on here. We went to the moon....hahahahahahahahahaha Totally brainwashed
Ahh when we see all the streams and photos in realtime there are some embarrassments of flerfers going to be eating their hats for sure. 😉
 
Last edited:
Couple of hours I believe from now

Ahh when we see all the streams and photos in realtime there are some embarrassments of flerfers going to be eating their hats for sure. 😉

Looking forward to seeing 4K video from the moon rather than in black and white fuzzyvision
 
Will try and stay up and watch the launch. Been watching sky news for the last hour and it’s a long process for the astronauts to go through before take off.
 
Back
Top