GordonMuchallNo1Fan
Striker
So it's ok to take the piss out of how lesbians look?It’s clear one set are worse than the others. Both in content and in number
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So it's ok to take the piss out of how lesbians look?It’s clear one set are worse than the others. Both in content and in number
Yeah, that’s exactly what I saidSo it's ok to take the piss out of how lesbians look?
So you're fine with England cricketers tweeting taking the piss out of lesbians?Yeah, that’s exactly what I said
it’s like discussing this with a door, so I’ll wish you good night
How is Anderson’s tweet homophobic ?I don't have an issue with either posts but the ECB look a bit silly here. Lesbians may find the tweet by Anderson to be offensive, so the ECB should apply their logic and investigate like they are with Robinson. They clearly aren't which makes them hypocrites and once again utterly pathetic
How is Anderson’s tweet homophobic ?
He’s obviously joking that one of his mates looks like a lass.
Morgan/Buttler are not being racist. They are just using an ‘in’ joke, again between mates
Presumably the ECB naively thought that the ‘issue’ started and finished with Ollie Robinson.He said "Thought he looked like a 15 yr old lesbian!"
some may deem that homophobic
(for the record I don't find it offensive and don't believe he should be suspended, I am merely trying to understand the logic from the ECB here).
Presumably the ECB naively thought that the ‘issue’ started and finished with Ollie Robinson.
They should have checked out all other players before punishing Robinson (who was in the wrong btw).
Now the ECB have a bigger problem to resolve
Yeah, that’s exactly what I said
it’s like discussing this with a door, so I’ll wish you good night
Levels? Who decides the levels? What levels are acceptable and what are not?How is it irrelevant? Surely there are levels to this?
should Root be suspended because he said boobs?
Can you get levels of outrage anarl, levels ffs.How is it irrelevant? Surely there are levels to this?
should Root be suspended because he said boobs?
Just need to drop Stuart Broad and that will take care of all the punishments required for that account allegedly likeAre they going to re-investigate the fake KP twitter account and ban everyone for bullying in the workplace?
Maybe it was a compliment? 15 year old lasses take far more pride in their hair that most lads doSo you're fine with England cricketers tweeting taking the piss out of lesbians?
Maybe so but the ECB should take time to find out these things, like they are with RobinsonMaybe it was a compliment? 15 year old lasses take far more pride in their hair that most lads do
Personally I think there should be a statute of limitations on this sort of thing - pulling up daft tweets when some of them were barely out of short pants is a jokeMaybe so but the ECB should take time to find out these things, like they are with Robinson
Personally I think there should be a statute of limitations on this sort of thing - pulling up daft tweets when some of them were barely out of short pants is a joke
Easy method is to ban all centrally contracted players from social media
Fair point. Where does it all stop? Once you censure one person, can you justifiably ignore the rest?They've set the bar now with the Robinson carry on, it now seems some think "ah that one wasn't too bad so it's ok" which to be honest is a poor reason/justification for not applying to same consistency of suspension/investigate/educate. The ECB didn't expect this and purely expected to use Robinson as a sole example not realising others have being daft on twitter. They're coming out of this yet again as looking like complete clowns.
As someone has pointed out, should they re-investigate the fake KP bullying account?
Should they look at Ben Stokes when he took the piss out of Harvey Price (disabled) again?
Yup hence I'm bemused by the logic of the ECB. They've dug a hole for themselves.Fair point. Where does it all stop? Once you censure one person, can you justifiably ignore the rest?