Another target gone all because of a few grand

Status
Not open for further replies.


kildaremackem said:
make up your mind what you want? almost all the players third diuvision teams sign are cast offs-becayse they will have been at a higher league. of the ones that werent cast offs...baldwin was signed from a league one promotion rival..wyke wasnt a cast off..john mac wasnt a cast off..dyln mac wasnt a cast off..
so we either isgn players from higher diovisons..thereofre cast offs because they arent going to want to drop a division..or we sign ones that are from our division and wont be cast offs..but many of those havent been very good..

SD doesnt make deicisons on which footballers to sign..he just signs the cheques..SD has admitted he failed this year..but people making up stiries about players turning uis down for money must piss him off..


the club was hideously badly run for a decade..mostly because people thought "we have a billioanire owner so its doesnt matter-if we fail just get more money from him" any club run like that is set up to fail...and thats why safc failed..but people instead just want back to the billioanire running it badly model..not the clever people rtunning it properly mode..
Click to expand...
Spot on marra
 
oddbod said:
Clever people with money as a backup would be my option!Lets not get carried away though with the praise until it is deserved don got a very good deal from short(is anyone arguing about that?)There was even a problem after the deal was signed with the money for (name escapes me)fro a court hearing and even then short helped our don with adjusting the repayments....so lets just say short gave the don a decent deal.!

What i can see is that they have gone on a much needed cost cutting rampage,cutting everything to the bone!they failed on the pitch in my view by signing two broke (physically)strikers that cost us promotion .......and now they are looking for investment even though we are still in league one ................its not the narrative they pushed when they first tookover was it?

lets see what happens over the next couple of years fella as hindsight is usually the best arena to play billy big balls!My view and its only based on supposition is the three amigos are like folks who have gone to a horse riding school and once they have mounted the sedate ,docile old nags realise they havee been given the mad stallions to ride and are hanging on for their lives and hope to get of pdq.As its easy to slash and cut costs but building club from the trainwreck that is SAFC needs brains and money and they, if the rumours are true are passing on the financial burden onto others,and after only one year in charge as well..Good luck to them if they are doing it in the best interests of the club but a pox on all their financial dealings in the future if they have just been taking us for a ride!
Click to expand...
the owenrs didnt sign anyone-they don t pick the players.
the owners didnt go ona cost cutting rampage-they spent millions on transfers..
they have to be careful with wages because its an fa rule..but even then have made it better by growing the turnover (whenever they charge fans for someothing it goes rto turniver and then they have more to spend on wages)
did they get a cheap deal off short? yes..but it was made cheaper by the execellent off the field work they did to make safc a fgood busines sagain.
they are accountable for on the fiekd stuff because they picked the manager etc but they dont sign players.
 
kildaremackem said:
the owenrs didnt sign anyone-they don t pick the players.
the owners didnt go ona cost cutting rampage-they spent millions on transfers..
they have to be careful with wages because its an fa rule..but even then have made it better by growing the turnover (whenever they charge fans for someothing it goes rto turniver and then they have more to spend on wages)
did they get a cheap deal off short? yes..but it was made cheaper by the execellent off the field work they did to make safc a fgood busines sagain.
they are accountable for on the fiekd stuff because they picked the manager etc but they dont sign players.
Click to expand...

It's owners I'm certain your keyboard is dyslexic
 
So as always with threads this time of year.. pointless however i do wonder how long we are going be waiting for that first signing.
 
kildaremackem said:
the owenrs didnt sign anyone-they don t pick the players.
the owners didnt go ona cost cutting rampage-they spent millions on transfers..
they have to be careful with wages because its an fa rule..but even then have made it better by growing the turnover (whenever they charge fans for someothing it goes rto turniver and then they have more to spend on wages)
did they get a cheap deal off short? yes..but it was made cheaper by the execellent off the field work they did to make safc a fgood busines sagain.
they are accountable for on the fiekd stuff because they picked the manager etc but they dont sign players.
Click to expand...
They do sign players fella ,in that they are involved in the deal ..to think otherwise makes what you say look foolish!I think what you mean is that ross has a list of players he wants and don tries to get them...somewhere in the discussion will be the price to pay and the utility of doing so!buying an injured player was foolish imho.
 
oddbod said:
They do sign players fella ,in that they are involved in the deal ..to think otherwise makes what you say look foolish!I think what you mean is that ross has a list of players he wants and don tries to get them...somewhere in the discussion will be the price to pay and the utility of doing so!buying an injured player was foolish imho.
Click to expand...
the chairman might negotiate the fee yes (he doesnt richard hill does) but he doesnt chosse the players-who are the voices in your head saying we signed that was injured?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top