Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't really get the point of forcing him to retire.
If you want to give others a chance then do that, but forcibly removing your greatest ever bowler from your options just seems daft.
You don't have to pick him every game or even at all, though in English conditions he's surely still our best bowler.
it's a disgrace in my opinion. he's still one of, if not the, best in English conditions.I don't really get the point of forcing him to retire.
If you want to give others a chance then do that, but forcibly removing your greatest ever bowler from your options just seems daft.
You don't have to pick him every game or even at all, though in English conditions he's surely still our best bowler.
Could you imagine the Aussies doing this to Warney or Glenn McGrath before '06?it's a disgrace in my opinion. he's still one of, if not the, best in English conditions.
I don't care who we are playing in a test match we should be playing our best players.
forcing him out leaves a sour taste.
Not really. There is logic behind finding a wicket keeper that is a class bat and has the game to score runs with the tail. We always need to look to improve but Anderson is currently our best bowlerNo different to the treatment dished out to Bairstow and Foakes
I would dare suggest the only player in the current XI who will be playing in Brisbane did not bowl. A folly as a coach
He's 35, he'll be 36 for the Ashes. But they're going for him and WoodsI think Jimmy is good enough to play on and hence keep some experience, but Woakes as much as I love him, looks jaded.