• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Adam Pearson Consortium

Status
Not open for further replies.

lozza said:
Or theyve had a look at the books and ran a mile
Click to expand...

maybe. cant remember where I read it, where it said short was to write off money owed to him but there was another debt. I wonder if that was the sbc debt or if it was another.

surely if interest was ended sometime ago, why wasn't the story published earlier. something going on :confused:
 
ShieldsBlackCat2015 said:
Why is Ricard Minnear wrong and Alan Nixon right? People seem to want to believe one over the other.
Click to expand...

Because i believe Nixon and he has been decent on our stuff for a while. He wouldn’t publish it without checking / proof first

Alternatively you could believe the Hull Daily Mail

My feeling is someone is using the local press to play games, we’ll see soon enough
 
lozza said:
mainly due him being spot on about us for a long time and the shields gazette being shite for nearly a decade
Click to expand...
ShieldsBlackCat2015 said:
Why is Ricard Minnear wrong and Alan Nixon right? People seem to want to believe one over the other.
Click to expand...
Minnear just copies things from the tabloids and has done so again copying from the mail. Wouldn't surprise me if he changes his story again after reading Nixon's latest tweets
 
ShieldsBlackCat2015 said:
Nothing has come of any consortium. Why should I believe it till it has happened? Should I get all worked up and excited about what Mr Pearson intends to do with the club?
Click to expand...
You don't know nothing has become of them. Business deals are rarely conducted in public, especially if there are rival bidders. Due diligence may have been done and the facts could be being discussed amongst the consortium or finance arranged. Just giving examples of why nothing has been heard...yet!
 
ShieldsBlackCat2015 said:
Could you name examples of when he was right?
Click to expand...
i don't have saved articles on my phone as to when he's been right about us , but many on here no he's broke stories on us which are true plus he answers peoples questions on twitter he deffo has inside info on us, sunderland echo shields gazette are shite and only report on things that have been reported elsewhere
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
What finance you can attract depends on assets as much as income. The SoL alone has an investment property valuation pushing £100m. £66m would be a stretch, but knock of the £20m bond, and summer incoming transfers, which could realistically be £20-25m, and the remaining £25-30m ought to be able to be rolled over into a new 5-10 year loan.
Click to expand...
The terms didn't look very good, to me, on the original SBC loan. Could we have got a better deal and not been paying out so much interest? I know this is probably an uneducated question!
 
soapster said:
maybe. cant remember where I read it, where it said short was to write off money owed to him but there was another debt. I wonder if that was the sbc debt or if it was another.

surely if interest was ended sometime ago, why wasn't the story published earlier. something going on :confused:
Click to expand...
Alan nixon saying it's still very active so we shall see
 
Secret Visage said:
Speedy was a fortnight ahead of the pack with one of the names for the other group (as was I by the way).
Click to expand...
Can I have your autograph?

I am only interested in info that is available not someone coming on bragging that they knew but didn't disclose it. I understand the reasons for not disclosing info but not reasons to brag about having the info.
 
When the story broke about Pearson last night why didn’t the ITK’s come out immediately and tell us the talks had ended? Ah yes that’s right because like I’ve said all along they know nowt
 
lozza said:
i don't have saved articles on my phone as to when he's been right about us , but many on here no he's broke stories on us which are true plus he answers peoples questions on twitter he deffo has inside info on us, sunderland echo shields gazette are shite and only report on things that have been reported elsewhere
Click to expand...

You don't need a phone. Memory helps.

lozza said:
Alan nixon saying it's still very active so we shall see
Click to expand...

A lot of people can't. That's the trouble.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top