• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Adam Johnson

Status
Not open for further replies.

Not one single quote in the whole piece.

Also love the way The Sun has taken it upon itself to redefine the meaning of the word paedophile; they use it repeatedly (along with 'paedo' which I assume they've done for those Sun readers who aren't familiar with the full word).

He's not a paedohile, he's a predator who made a very, very bad decision and is now rightly paying for it.
 
Stevos said:
Not one single quote in the whole piece.

Also love the way The Sun has taken it upon itself to redefine the meaning of the word paedophile; they use it repeatedly (along with 'paedo' which I assume they've done for those Sun readers who aren't familiar with the full word).

He's not a paedohile, he's a predator who made a very, very bad decision and is now rightly paying for it.
Click to expand...

The article is shite like
 
sessions said:
Why ?
Click to expand...

A) what he did to the young lass was horrific

B) he abused his position of trust and clearly knew he was doing wrong as he was telling her to delete the messages to cover his back

C) he lied to the club, fans, his missus and everyone else and pleaded his innocence right up until his trial when the sordid details came out in court

D) He hasn't shown a single scrap of remorse

E) He still appears to be acting Billy Bigballs inside although I appreciate that might just be paper talk

F) The job entails contact with children when signing autographs, visiting hosptials, schools, clubs etc. There would be a safeguarding issues there.
 
everstar said:
Because it wouldn't have been against the law?
Click to expand...

I know age of consent is 14 in Germany but that's only if the other person is under 21. Which would make what he did illegal- just wondered if there was some other reason.
 
The only restrictions that should be placed on him are that whilst he is on the SOR he should be banned from having a job involved in the safeguarding of children, or a job in which he would be a responsible adult for children to go too. I see no logical reason why he shouldn't be allowed to play professional football in this country once he is out.
 
0321safc said:
That article is designed as an attack at SAFC you can tell by the tone of it. For me once he is out of prison, he should be free to play football again.
Click to expand...
I’m sure he will be. But where and for whom and under what conditions ? I doubt there will be a queue for his services.
 
zidanny said:
Once Hea served his time he's free to live a normal life and if that means playingbfir us then so be it.
Click to expand...

If SAFC re-employed a convicted sex offender who lied to them throughout the entire case then they would face a shit-storm from their own supporters, from supporters across the country, from local media, from national media and possibly even further afield. And it would be 100% deserved.

To think there are people who wouldnt accept the return of Jack Colback because he made some slightly childish remarks about boyhood allegiances but would accept the return of an absolute slug of a human being to the club makes the mind absolutely boggle.

I'd find it very difficult to support the club again if we went anywhere near the cretin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top