R
Reiver
Guest
...even prior to an arrest being made! (maybe that's what you mean?)
I'm not sure of the exact time line so didn't want to exaggerate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...even prior to an arrest being made! (maybe that's what you mean?)
Bit harsh to blame her for little Milton mind.Well she's still going to get the blame for it,and the Nunez shit.
No she was given transcripts of police interviews in May, after his suspension was lifted and after he had been arrested and allowed to carry on playing.
If you're going to throw accusations at least get them right.
Article in this mornings express claiming that the victim is to sue Johnson for £1m in damages
Who are these posters that you keep going on about that clearly hate the club?And that, is exactly what would happen ........ I half suspect that some of the 'experts' on here want another statement for just that reason.
I was never asking for anything in regards to Hillsborough, unlike some people on here.
So it's a totally different situation but don't let that stop you.
We know the bit from The police, fella. That meeting happened before Johnson had been interviewed so the police told the club nothing.The allegations though are that Johnson himself was at the meeting and volunteered information to the club. That's all we need to know......what did Johnson say, if indeed he said anything and what did the police say Johnson had admitted to them. Surely most of us knowing that exact information could make a considered judgement on whether the club acted correctly in their subsequent actions.
i know it might be hard but one day you might be able to read too!!Apology accepted
So your basically saying those who think questions need answering should not use this public forum to air there views but instead write to the club instead?
No, he thinks people who write to the club are the worst of the lot iirc
The allegations though are that Johnson himself was at the meeting and volunteered information to the club. That's all we need to know......what did Johnson say, if indeed he said anything and what did the police say Johnson had admitted to them. Surely most of us knowing that exact information could make a considered judgement on whether the club acted correctly in their subsequent actions.
We know the bit from The police, fella. That meeting happened before Johnson had been interviewed so the police told the club nothing.
Luke Edwards, isn't he the journalist who accused Johnson of doing the mh17 celebration? he's tweeting at the moment having a go at our fans
Seems people don't want to hear that though mate. They'd rather think the worst.saw something on twitter last night from a copper that stated that the police wouldn't disclose specifics bar the charges against him, it was down to the accused party to discuss what actually happened with an employer.
His QC apparently handed transcripts of his police interviews to the club, these same police interviews where Johnson has admitted lying in to save himself.
Maybe so but i dont think that information will be forthcoming.The allegations though are that Johnson himself was at the meeting and volunteered information to the club. That's all we need to know......what did Johnson say, if indeed he said anything and what did the police say Johnson had admitted to them. Surely most of us knowing that exact information could make a considered judgement on whether the club acted correctly in their subsequent actions.
We know the bit from The police, fella. That meeting happened before Johnson had been interviewed so the police told the club nothing.
You took that well loli know it might be hard but one day you might be able to read too!!
stick at it and good for you.
A lot being said about the special nature of this (as opposed to a plumber from Darlo etc) - seems to me such a long delay in the court date was the major factor in the fingers now being pointed at the club. Innocent until proven guilty is easy to say and just as easy to dismiss but that year's delay has hurt the club - when the sum total of the evidence is available messages, a small number of second hand witnesses, and the testimony of those involved, why such a delay? No complex forensics, no search for a weapon etc etc. Surely in the public interest and interests of the accused and victim this should have been processed to the point of trial with haste and 'Wearside women' would be better criticising the system for delaying than the club for being in a diificult position as employer.
However destructive my loss to you isYou took that well lol
So your basically saying those who think questions need answering should not use this public forum to air there views but instead write to the club instead?