• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Adam Johnson Trial Verdict

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kenna said:
The club needed him to play in the relegation battle it's the only logic I can see can the club, his lawyers despite claiming he didn't do it for money may have told him to do it for that, both sides have reasons they could have done it for just a shame if that is why we done it it's an utterly pathic decision and reason to do it.
Click to expand...
He hardly played especially after the meeting did he? We only had 3 games left iirc.
 

walesie said:
For someone with little interest you've had a lot to say on the matter.

If you're telling the truth and haven't read them, I suggest you do, then you might have some idea why the people you're dismissing are angry with the club.
Click to expand...

I'm interested as to why attention seeking people would spend days on here knowing it's all a waste of time.

It's quite amusing watching highly principled people sitting on their arses doing nothing of any use while believing they are.
 
Jack Torrance said:
So what if the club did know? Nowt is gonna happen we broke no rules. Not sure what people are expecting disappointing from the club but he's not our problem anymore
Click to expand...

Correct no FA rules were broken but morally and ethically SAFC have come out of this episode looking like nothing short of a disgrace to the rest of the nation whether it be sporting or non sporting

Their statement that was released too was an absolute farce
 
SAFC weren't obliged to make the first statement.

Looking at the hysterical conspiracy theorists reaction it's certain they won't issue another.

But knowing that won't stop the endless pontificating.
 
Reiver said:
The people who are demanding a statement 'to clarify things' would be gutted if they did.

It would mean they'd lose the opportunity for some foot stamping and toy throwing.

Otherwise they'd just carry on claiming the club are bullshitting and the statement in a cover up.
Click to expand...

I don't think you can back up your argument that people are only criticising the club for the sake of it. You certainly can't back up your statement that people would be disappointed if the club released a statement which clarified the position in a manner which showed they hadn't done anything wrong.
 
Cockney Mackem said:
I don't think you can back up your argument that people are only criticising the club for the sake of it. You certainly can't back up your statement that people would be disappointed if the club released a statement which clarified the position in a manner which showed they hadn't done anything wrong.
Click to expand...

It's my honest opinion on both counts your honour.
 
Cockney Mackem said:
I don't think you can back up your argument that people are only criticising the club for the sake of it. You certainly can't back up your statement that people would be disappointed if the club released a statement which clarified the position in a manner which showed they hadn't done anything wrong.
Click to expand...


a statement about the statement is needed
 
Ilios said:
So why would he admit to the club he was guilty because of overwhelming evidence, and then plead not guilty on legal advice? It's nonsensical, self-contradictory, and self-incriminating.
Click to expand...
I asked if he'd have still played Johnson having read the messages, messages that the club had access to. I'd not mentioned his plea or supposed admission.
 
walesie said:
Quite. You do see the irony here don't you?
Click to expand...

There's no irony although I accept that's a popular word on here for people who have run out of answers.

I'm happily spending time on here because I find it entertaining.

The people demanding something they know they won't get are attention seeking time wasters who are getting nothing out of it.

Not ironical in the least.

luvulongtime said:
a statement about the statement is needed
Click to expand...

Followed by a statement in the house ........ hear hear, the convicted is a very nasty man!
 
Reiver said:
There's no irony although I accept that's a popular word on here for people who have run out of answers.

I'm happily spending time on here because I find it entertaining.

The people demanding something they know they won't get are attention seeking time wasters who are getting nothing out of it.

Not ironical in the least.
Click to expand...
People are discussing a point relating to their club, which is entertaining, however if they disagree with you they are just pontificating, attention seeking and wasting time. Reiver logic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top