radjee gadjee
Striker
Exactly.Don't teachers regularly get less time for having sex with pupils? I was shocked when I read it could be that long.
And Catholic priests either get promoted or given sainthoods for the very same thing !!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly.Don't teachers regularly get less time for having sex with pupils? I was shocked when I read it could be that long.
Arguably a worse crime if you are a teacher anarl as you are in a position of trust with the pupils
Not sure what workplace you work in then. I would be suspended immediately. As would most public employees be.Innocent until proven guilty. Don't think it's the right thing to do to suspend anyone until guilt is proven.
Has it been taken down? There was so many posts I may have replied to the wrong one
Well yes and thatAlso a worse crime because the teacher actually shagged them as well.
Its not most though, is it? I for one, feel they've said enough. Bleating on for more from them does nobody any good, and just drags it all on even more. He's been proven to be a liar, and the club have said he lied to them.So why didn't the club refute the lies in the club statement and address the one issue most are asking about?
Without reading the 58 pages, the Daily Star certainly haven't held back.You must be logged on to see external links
tidied.ees a miracayle we're still in the league
red tops mate.Johnson is scum, but that headline is a disgrace. He still has a family and they don't deserve that
Not sure what workplace you work in then. I would be suspended immediately. As would most public employees be.
FFS. Let's not bother with courts. Let's just decide they're guilty, and lynch them.But it doesn't mean he didn't do it like
Lucky you then. I know what you mean though.I wouldn't be like, we were talking about it at work once. There was a fella falsely accused of rape, which collapsed before trial, he carried on working as long as he could.
There are different circumstances, but I wish people would not go on like its a black and white issue.
Lucky you then.
It doesn't at all.
Read about English Law.
There is no such concept as what you're claiming, although there is under Scottish Law.
Under English Law a Not Guilty verdict means you are not culpable of the crime with which you are charged.
You clearly have little understanding of English Law.
A Not Guilty verdict does in fact mean you are not culpable of the crime with which you have been charged.
That verdict is used to specifically express that you are not guilty, in other words innocent, of the crime brought before you. Moreover, you didn't do it.
But, as others have stated, they have not denied the statement that was made against them in that they knew that he had confessed to some of the allegations, i.e kissing the lass. They have issued a statement only saying that they were not aware that he was going to plead guilty. They have not mentioned anything about knowing he had admitted that he had done it.Its not most though, is it? I for one, feel they've said enough. Bleating on for more from them does nobody any good, and just drags it all on even more. He's been proven to be a liar, and the club have said he lied to them.
I know. But Johnson should have been suspended until cleared or proven guilty.Yeah, great answer that like
He wasn't a public employee. Think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. Think we can all agree that the club needs to put the whole sorry affair behind them.Not sure what workplace you work in then. I would be suspended immediately. As would most public employees be.
It's also not true.Johnson is scum, but that headline is a disgrace. He still has a family and they don't deserve that