HebburnMackem
Striker
When (if) these start selling later in the year, how much do you expect the 2nd hand 7D's to be going for?
7D Mark II
- Thread starter HebburnMackem
- Start date
- Status
A
ayesane
Guest
sold mine for £620 just t'other week. Which to the untrained eye is a cracking deal! I only paid £100 more and took over 15000 photos with it.
HebburnMackem
Striker
Are you on a 5D M3 now?
A
ayesane
Guest
HebburnMackem
Striker
Last edited:
A
ajax_andy
Guest
It's starting to be a bit of a dated camera now and if the MK II comes out I can see the price dropping even more.
Problem for those wanting to sell it to upgrade to an MK II is that if you sell now you won't have a camera, and if you wait it'll be worth less.
That's what happens though and unless shooting fast moving action I'd recommend the Ayesane route of sell now and get a 6D
Aye worlds apart and I mean WORLDS!
Problem for those wanting to sell it to upgrade to an MK II is that if you sell now you won't have a camera, and if you wait it'll be worth less.
That's what happens though and unless shooting fast moving action I'd recommend the Ayesane route of sell now and get a 6D
Aye worlds apart and I mean WORLDS!
A
ayesane
Guest
chalk and cheese. 6d is possibly the second best Canon there is for low light, better then the 5d mkIII some say.
7d is a million times better with the clumsy focus of the 6d (it really is shit). 7d also had a huge buffer and can easily do 50 images before it starts to think .. 6d you're lucky to get 7.
7d is a cracking camera and IMO is technically much better then the 6d, just not FF and does not have the low light. Here is a ISO 12800 with zero NR:
Logon or register to see this image
it's pretty unbelievable TBH..
Last edited by a moderator:
HebburnMackem
Striker
chalk and cheese. 6d is possibly the second best Canon there is for low light, better then the 5d mkIII some say.
7d is a million times better with the clumsy focus of the 6d (it really is shit). 7d also had a huge buffer and can easily do 50 images before it starts to think .. 6d you're lucky to get 7.
Here is a ISO 12800 with zero NR:
Logon or register to see this image
it's pretty unbelievable TBH..
That is fantastic....
I wonder if the 7D MK2 is going to have better ISO performance than the 7D?
A
ajax_andy
Guest
chalk and cheese. 6d is possibly the second best Canon there is for low light, better then the 5d mkIII some say.
7d is a million times better with the clumsy focus of the 6d (it really is shit). 7d also had a huge buffer and can easily do 50 images before it starts to think .. 6d you're lucky to get 7.
Here is a ISO 12800 with zero NR:
Logon or register to see this image
it's pretty unbelievable TBH..
Thing is you can't compare low light performance of the 6D & 5D MKIII without looking at the focus issues of the 6D in even moderately low light. ISO performance is about on par but a shot I tried to and failed to lock focus with the 6D outer focal points locked instantly with the MKIII.
Low light performance is more than just ISO performance at the end of the day
A
ayesane
Guest
Thing is you can't compare low light performance of the 6D & 5D MKIII without looking at the focus issues of the 6D in even moderately low light. ISO performance is about on par but a shot I tried to and failed to lock focus with the 6D outer focal points locked instantly with the MKIII.
Low light performance is more than just ISO performance at the end of the day
yer reet like- i should have said ISO performance. The 6d focusing system is shocking, it sometimes searches when it's overcast, even at the centre.
Tried some video at the weekend and auto focus barely works at all!
Last edited by a moderator:
yer reet like- i should have said ISO performance. The 6d focusing system is shocking, it sometimes searches when it's overcast, even at the centre.
Tried some video at the weekend and auto focus barely works at all!
Really?! Might get a mk III
A
ayesane
Guest
I struggled with it mate, had to do it in manual focus in the end. Probably me doing summit wrong, never done video before.
A might get a MKIII if you do like.
A
ajax_andy
Guest
It's fine in most cases but its not 100% so it comes down to how much you need to nail a specific shot. If you aren't doing stuff where you get one chance and that's it to get the pic then then 6D is all the camera you'd ever need
I'm only joking Andy, I'd go for a 1dx, wouldn't fuck around with a mere mk iii
A
ajax_andy
Guest
A
ayesane
Guest
As most on here seem to be canon fans, can anyone explain the logic of the numbers?
As I understand it the
6 is top end professional
60 is professional
600 is a good camera, just cheaper build quality and a few less functions
but how and where do the 7/70/700 range fit in and the 5/50/500 range?
And is the 1 still the be all and have all?
And where does the rarely mentioned 3 range fit in?
(I understand mark i mark ii and mark iii etc just being updated tweaked versions)
As I understand it the
6 is top end professional
60 is professional
600 is a good camera, just cheaper build quality and a few less functions
but how and where do the 7/70/700 range fit in and the 5/50/500 range?
And is the 1 still the be all and have all?
And where does the rarely mentioned 3 range fit in?
(I understand mark i mark ii and mark iii etc just being updated tweaked versions)
A
ayesane
Guest
6 is semi-pro
60 is enthusiast
600 loves their cat and pretty flowers.
1100 is basically a bridge, although pure dslr
1dx is pro, there is another level above, medium format, which Canon are not involved in.
- Status
