• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

19/11/16 - 5pm - Protest at the Murray Gates

Status
Not open for further replies.

John J Rambo said:
PDC, aye was a controversial one but it kept us up, but ok that was a mistake. De fanti and congerton, he felt he had to try something as money was being wasted already and we were struggling before then. It didn't work and he got rid. Alvarez? how is that his fault? He doesn't tell people who to sign, he backed someone to make a decision on a player, who made the wrong one. Byrne? how has that got anything to do with what happens on the pitch and why we struggle? I'm not saying he's blameless, but he's not the reason behind everything you make out at all. I certainly won't be protesting, as at least he's tried and backed us more than any other chairman to try make us competitive, with which how much we've spent, we should be.
Click to expand...
1) PDC was an obvious mistake from the outset IMO.
2) De Fanti was clearly underqualified.
3) Congerton hardly had a good CV.
4) who's decision other than the owners do you think it would be to challenge alvarez deal? In a business , where there's a decision that amounts to challenging almost 10% of revenue, of course he would have the final decision.
5) byrne was clearly underqualified - and he let her get away with bad decisions. She had an obvious impact on on the field decisions. How can that not be his remit? That was his second in command and she left in disgrace?

Reiver said:
The accusations of me being drunk are cheap but totally expected ..... my friend.
Click to expand...
I notice no denial :lol:
 
haway said:
I notice no denial :lol:
Click to expand...

Are you denying being an attention seeking fantasist?

So, to clarify .....you'll be at the gates protesting, as a matter of principal, but will just walk off if people don't join you?
 
haway said:
1) PDC was an obvious mistake from the outset IMO.
2) De Fanti was clearly underqualified.
3) Congerton hardly had a good CV.
4) who's decision other than the owners do you think it would be to challenge alvarez deal? In a business , where there's a decision that amounts to challenging almost 10% of revenue, of course he would have the final decision.
5) byrne was clearly underqualified - and he let her get away with bad decisions. She had an obvious impact on on the field decisions. How can that not be his remit? That was his second in command and she left in disgrace?


I notice no denial :lol:
Click to expand...


You do spout some shite, will you be chained to The Murray Gates on the day?
 
Reiver said:
2 which most people know, this and a previous one with virtually the same spelling.

Do I take it the protest is off now?
Click to expand...
Yeah. I posted this to see what the unofficial spokesman of the Sunderland supporters thought and since he disapproves I've decided to call it off and will only resort to abusing the players in future as he suggests.

Reiver said:
Are you denying being an attention seeking fantasist?

So, to clarify .....you'll be at the gates protesting, as a matter of principal, but will just walk off if people don't join you?
Click to expand...
Have another glass of wine and talk to your family mate.

Wayne The Punk said:
You do spout some shite, will you be chained to The Murray Gates on the day?
Click to expand...
Yes. Just as I said I would. So you can throw eggs at me.
 
haway said:
Yeah. I posted this to see what the unofficial spokesman of the Sunderland supporters thought and since he disapproves I've decided to call it off and will only resort to abusing the players in future as he suggests.
Click to expand...

I only ever speak for myself.

In this case I'm saying I think you soon abandoned your staunch views and high principles.
 
haway said:
Yeah. I posted this to see what the unofficial spokesman of the Sunderland supporters thought and since he disapproves I've decided to call it off and will only resort to abusing the players in future as he suggests.


Have another glass of wine and talk to your family mate.


Yes. Just as I said I would. So you can throw eggs at me.
Click to expand...


We shall see
 
8 JLB said:
Dear god.

Anyway. If nothing else this thread proves 3 things.

1. The tide is turning and the tipping point is approaching. This sort of thread wouldn't have appeared on here even 4 weeks ago.

2. Fan opinion is pretty divided still. People are not entirely sure who is to blame or indeed what the answer is.

3. This forum exists, largely, for approx 6 psychopaths to rant on and on about themselves - to the total detriment of a decent discussion about such a key topic
Click to expand...


Off to bed now, early start in the morning, still waiting for you to imagine 6 names, Hope your teddy bear sleeps well
 
haway said:
1) PDC was an obvious mistake from the outset IMO.
2) De Fanti was clearly underqualified.
3) Congerton hardly had a good CV.
4) who's decision other than the owners do you think it would be to challenge alvarez deal? In a business , where there's a decision that amounts to challenging almost 10% of revenue, of course he would have the final decision.
5) byrne was clearly underqualified - and he let her get away with bad decisions. She had an obvious impact on on the field decisions. How can that not be his remit? That was his second in command and she left in disgrace?


I notice no denial :lol:
Click to expand...
PDC wasn't a mistake from the outset, as he kept us up when we looked as good as down, obvious it wasn't working early in next season so got rid. De fanti and congerton didn't work out, he tried to stop money being wasted, failed yes and he got rid of them, so that was his mistake. He doesn't tell managers who and whi not to sign and all he done with Alvarez was back his manager, not his fault at all. Byrne, whatever her role was, she wasn't on the training ground, doing team talks, picking the side, telling managers what players to sign or sell, so that makes no difference to what's happening in the pitch.

Basically, he made a mistake in the long run with PDC, who many loved early on with his what's right and wrong with these players and trying a DOF model, that does work btw at other clubs, to try stop the money he's put in being wasted. Again, he realised this wasn't working either and binned it for Allardyce. Backing his manager again. Aye mate, totally deserves a protest, Fuck me.

What about Bruce, O'Neill, advocaat twice, Allardyce and Moyes, who everyone was happy about? likewise when he got rid of them? he's spent money to make us competitive and its been wasted. He's made mistakes, but tried all he can realistically do, to make us better as well. Protesting against him, personally I don't think is right at all. Especially when I really think he would sell and leave if he could anyway.
 
Last edited:
haway said:
Maybe if it was 1980 and I could make up a story about fighting Chelsea fans I would
Click to expand...

I've never made up any stories on here, not once.

But I see you're now avoiding your failed thread with more personal stuff.

So much for the intelligent debate you're always bleating on about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top