brandon
Striker
We've got a long tail. I doubt we'd have managed much over 220-230.
Pointless argument seeing as the player who won that match was already out, and helped by a batsman who wasn't playing today. No way our tail was amassing 300
And if we'd looked at the weather forecast it would have been immediately obvious we didn't have another 40 overs.
Wessels out. Time to make a game of it?
Countless numbers of Cricketers past and present say ‘play the game, not the conditions’. Whilst it isn’t raining and you have 50 overs, you’ve got to make on as if you’ve got 50 overs.
What you going on about though? The player who won that game was already out.....? We had a player who failed in that game who was unbeaten on 50 - perhaps he’d have been our match winner today? Who knows. Our tail may have wagged, who knows.