• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Jimmy Anderson

Status
Not open for further replies.

essex boy said:
fed up of upstarts like you, if you dont like being patronized dont do it to other people
Click to expand...

That's the second time in my life i've been called an upstart, the first time was once again by yourself.

By the way, that's patronised.

I'm happy to discuss Cricket etc with anyone, but you're inability to argue your point coherently makes it less than pleasurable. You also seem to have some sort of ranking system, in which only certain people may engage with you, based on how long they have posted on the Cricket board.
 
GarethQ said:
That's the second time in my life i've been called an upstart, the first time was once again by yourself.

By the way, that's patronised.

I'm happy to discuss Cricket etc with anyone, but you're inability to argue your point coherently makes it less than pleasurable. You also seem to have some sort of ranking system, in which only certain people may engage with you, based on how long they have posted on the Cricket board.
Click to expand...

your right I do, as you get more respect from them as they have been on here a lot longer and dont need to make a name for themself.

If I have such an inability to argue my point why do you seek to engage in debate with me.....never understood this point.

I stay well clear of certain people on PF its not dificult
 
essex boy said:
your right I do, as you get more respect from them as they have been on here a lot longer and dont need to make a name for themself.

If I have such an inability to argue my point why do you seek to engage in debate with me.....never understood this point.

I stay well clear of certain people on PF its not dificult
Click to expand...

So you think I go onto obscure internet cricket message boards in an aid to make a name for myself?

My point was, that if someone begins to debate with you you tend to ignore what they have said and claim they have a vendetta against you or something of that ilk.

Maybe if your views were more factual and balanced instead of one-eyed, it would make for a more interesting all round debate.
 
GarethQ said:
So you think I go onto obscure internet cricket message boards in an aid to make a name for myself?

My point was, that if someone begins to debate with you you tend to ignore what they have said and claim they have a vendetta against you or something of that ilk.

Maybe if your views were more factual and balanced instead of one-eyed, it would make for a more interesting all round debate.
Click to expand...

simple, dont engage in debate with me
 
GarethQ said:
So you only want to talk to people who agree with you, basically?

Funny that because you often appear to contradict yourself from argument to argument.
Click to expand...

Of the major debates (Anderson, Swann, Saj :)lol:) and now Tahir) no one agrees with him.
 
GarethQ said:
So you only want to talk to people who agree with you, basically?

Funny that because you often appear to contradict yourself from argument to argument.
Click to expand...

if I did that as Andy alluded to I wouldnt engage with anyone. next

dont slag someone off then expect them to debate with you
 
essex boy said:
if I did that as Andy alluded to I wouldnt engage with anyone. next

dont slag someone off then expect them to debate with you
Click to expand...

I think in our first exchange, you are the one who had a pop at me first matey. That's when you called me an 'upstart' or whatever first.

Andy.SAFC said:
Of the major debates (Anderson, Swann, Saj :)lol:) and now Tahir) no one agrees with him.
Click to expand...

I know this, just thought it was bizzare when I tried to debate with him he basically wouldn't as I hadn't been on the forum long enough or something.
 
GarethQ said:
I know this, just thought it was bizzare when I tried to debate with him he basically wouldn't as I hadn't been on the forum long enough or something.
Click to expand...

He's always like this. During the Ashes he posted a thread with a list of the people who he was willing to debate with. I think it's just an excuse when one of the less regular cricket board posters has a go at him and proves him wrong.

And to think I tried to defend there being a cricket board clique, well EB is certainly trying to make one.
 
Andy.SAFC said:
He's always like this. During the Ashes he posted a thread with a list of the people who he was willing to debate with. I think it's just an excuse when one of the less regular cricket board posters has a go at him and proves him wrong.

And to think I tried to defend there being a cricket board clique, well EB is certainly trying to make one.
Click to expand...


not at all, the Jimmy debate goes back many years, I dont need upstarts jumping in who havent been in the debate from the start
 
essex boy said:
not at all, the Jimmy debate goes back many years, I dont need upstarts jumping in who havent been in the debate from the start
Click to expand...

It goes round in circles every 2 days man.

And for the record, the Jimmy/Saj thing was well under way by the time I'd started posting here, so how come I am deemed worthy of contributing?
 
GarethQ said:
Indeed it isn't.

Anyway, to get it back on topic, I think Jimmy just about kept himself in the side with that 2-16 on Sunday. Bowled some great stuff.
Click to expand...

I didnt think he would get dropped but he could have had no complaints had he done. It was a good pitch to bowl on as both a seamer and a spinner but in ODIs on great batting pitches he is proving too expensive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top