It depends what you class as hooliganism.
Spot on, Riv. My interpretation always was the organised firms. You find daft aggressive assholes in every city, town and village. Hooligans they may be but we are talking football context here.
This from the
You must be logged on to see external links
Football hooliganism has no specific legal definition. The term was created by the media, the tabloid press in particular, in the mid-1960s and since then they have been extremely flexible and indeterminate in ascribing the "hooligan" label to different incidents. Football hooliganism is seen by most to mean violence and/or disorder involving football fans. However there are two very specific 'types' of disorder that have been labelled 'hooliganism': (a) Spontaneous and usually low level disorder caused by fans at or around football matches (the type that typically occurs at England away matches), and
(b) Deliberate and intentional violence involving organised gangs (or 'firms') who attach themselves to football clubs and fight firms from other clubs, sometimes a long way in time and space from a match. Therefore if you are using the term 'football hooliganism' in your work, be very clear about what it is you are referring to!
and
You must be logged on to see external links
There is no precise definition of ‘football hooliganism’. It lacks legal definition, precise
demarcation of membership and is used to cover a variety of actions which take place in more or
less directly football-related contexts. To account for some of the phenomenon’s main features, a distinction should be drawn between spontaneous, relatively isolated incidents of spectator violence and the behaviour of
socially organized or institutionalized fan (hooligan) groups which engage in competitive violence, principally with other hooligan groups.
BTW Riv - your recollections are classic and authentic. Breath of fresh air on here, mate.
Love the "Billy Liar" avatar. Top class! Nil Illegitimae tibi carborundum
