• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Ashes Inquest

Yeah both Rew and Smith should make squad for next test imo, as both quality and hopefully for the long term.

Smith should certainly not be just judged only of a terrible Ashes series as class act.
He appears to have acknowledged himself the weaknesses revealed in the Ashes.series. Batted early in the order and played a fine controlled innings v Warwickshire.
In contrast,no change with Crawley.
 
Last edited:

He appears to have acknowledged himself the weaknesses revealed in the Ashes.series. Batted early in the order and played a fine controlled innings v Warwickshire.
He is absolutely somebody worth persevering with imo.

Surrey were well out of the game after the first innings so it allowed him in the second to take his time and bat the way he did fair play to him.

He clearly a very very talented cricketer.
 
He is absolutely somebody worth persevering with imo.

Surrey were well out of the game after the first innings so it allowed him in the second to take his time and bat the way he did fair play to him.

He clearly a very very talented cricketer.
George Dobell on his innings
At times, he made batting look preposterously easy, too. Certainly, none of the Warwickshire bowlers were able to rush him. And, with a clear focus to save the game rather than try to set up a declaration, he demonstrated a restraint that has not always been apparent in his time with England. His century, for example, occupied 199 deliveries.
I don't think his ability was ever questioned. His ability to exercise control was.
 
Last edited:
I'd happily persist with Smith if he shows some early season form and if he has a poor series against NZ then that will be the time to drop him. I am a big fan of Foakes but Smith has a higher ceiling.

Who replaces Crawley is an interesting race. Haines will be in their thoughts, and I think if McKinney can make a couple of big scores he will be right in the mix.
 
He is absolutely somebody worth persevering with imo.

Surrey were well out of the game after the first innings so it allowed him in the second to take his time and bat the way he did fair play to him.

He clearly a very very talented cricketer.
Listened to Mark Butcher on Wisden who pointed out a couple of technical tweaks that Smith has put into practice which seem to be serving him well.

It’s quite exciting. He has the talent to completely marmalize an attack.

The only question mark over him is whether he has the mentality to succeed at Test level. He looked completely broken in Australia.
 
Listened to Mark Butcher on Wisden who pointed out a couple of technical tweaks that Smith has put into practice which seem to be serving him well.

It’s quite exciting. He has the talent to completely marmalize an attack.

The only question mark over him is whether he has the mentality to succeed at Test level. He looked completely broken in Australia.
He absolutely did, but I think somebody relatively young and relatively inexperienced should not be judged on one series.

He was certainly not the first and will definitely not be the last to look like that in a Aussie away series.

Looks like really knuckled down and started the season really well and all credit to him
 
Listened to Mark Butcher on Wisden who pointed out a couple of technical tweaks that Smith has put into practice which seem to be serving him well.

It’s quite exciting. He has the talent to completely marmalize an attack.

The only question mark over him is whether he has the mentality to succeed at Test level. He looked completely broken in Australia.
His keeping needs massive work. He isn't keeping for Surrey and 'Baz' doesn't seem to see any value in a dedicated keeping coach...
 
Back
Top