• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


Stella Spark said:
The official narrative changed. The most likely cause is lab leak.

You're like a Japanese soldier emerging from the jungle still fighting the war, decked out in face mask and smeared with hand sanitiser ;)
Click to expand...
Id done a bit of reading from your post Sparksy and it reckons more evidence still goes with animals over lab leak.
You must be logged on to see external links
 
Last edited:
The Blackcat Mackem said:
You must be logged on to see media items
Click to expand...
Do you honestly believe we live under a dome and can you explain how this matches what we can physically observe, i.e. provide a proof of how it works.

Or are you one of these half-arsed conspiracy theorists who posts a couple of lines and links to the social media works of others (a troll)?
 
The Blackcat Mackem said:
The answer is they are hiding our true realm and who created it. We all live in which is based on a flat stationary Plain covered with a firminment dome and pressuried. Operations in around 1948ish were all attempts to shash the dome but all failed as all rockets ever since. NASA was formed By Crowly, Parsons and Von Braun who were all practicing devil worshippers. NASA job was to decive the wrold and stop the masses having a central god like figure who would be stronger than the controlling governments
Click to expand...
How does any of this align with observational evidence?

For example if there is a clear night tonight and I look due north at 51.3 degrees to the horizon, I will see the star Polaris. My longitude is reported on maps as 51.3 degrees. If I take the same set up to my mam's house, I have to increase the angle to 54.9 degrees to see the same star. Why is that?

As you approach the north pole, Polaris gets closer to being directly overhead (90 degrees), while if you head towards the equator it gets lower to the horizon. As you cross the equator it disappears at all, but you start to see the southern cross appear to the south. Why? How?

How can any of this be possible if we live on a flat plate covered in a dome? I can quickly construct a model of exactly how it works on a globe using straight lines of sight, but there is no way to construct a model where it works with a dome of any shape.
 
DaveH said:
How does any of this align with observational evidence?

For example if there is a clear night tonight and I look due north at 51.3 degrees to the horizon, I will see the star Polaris. My longitude is reported on maps as 51.3 degrees. If I take the same set up to my mam's house, I have to increase the angle to 54.9 degrees to see the same star. Why is that?

As you approach the north pole, Polaris gets closer to being directly overhead (90 degrees), while if you head towards the equator it gets lower to the horizon. As you cross the equator it disappears at all, but you start to see the southern cross appear to the south. Why? How?

How can any of this be possible if we live on a flat plate covered in a dome? I can quickly construct a model of exactly how it works on a globe using straight lines of sight, but there is no way to construct a model where it works with a dome of any shape.
Click to expand...

I think it will be difficult to have a rational debate with someone who can only communicate via special software that recognises the shit smeared on the walls of his padded cell
 
Cockney Mackem said:
I think it will be difficult to have a rational debate with someone who can only communicate via special software that recognises the shit smeared on the walls of his padded cell
Click to expand...
And I got a warning because I hold a different view to others, yet you can offend openly. I have never attacked an individual but I get personal attacks non stop without punishment. As I said ealier I would defend my postion but I cant as my comment is not allowed.
 
The Blackcat Mackem said:
And I got a warning because I hold a different view to others, yet you can offend openly. I have never attacked an individual but I get personal attacks non stop without punishment. As I said ealier I would defend my postion but I cant as my comment is not allowed.
Click to expand...
I think you got the wrong end of the stick. I chatted to a mod. Warnings were for derailing the Artimis thread. But this thread is fine for such things.

Look at the posting history of Nukehasslefan, I very much doubt you could say anything that was not in the same vein of holding different views. So please do post your proof, I would love to see it.
 
DaveH said:
I think you got the wrong end of the stick. I chatted to a mod. Warnings were for derailing the Artimis thread. But this thread is fine for such things.

Look at the posting history of Nukehasslefan, I very much doubt you could say anything that was not in the same vein of holding different views. So please do post your proof, I would love to see it.
Click to expand...
Aye Nukey covered every angle didn't he 😂
Can't wait to read this newest geniuses evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top