hank williams
Striker
Or swap with Cole palmer but definitely not Liam delap he’s atrocious him for all the hypeShould be telling Chelsea that he’s better than Kepa, so they need to stump £80m.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or swap with Cole palmer but definitely not Liam delap he’s atrocious him for all the hypeShould be telling Chelsea that he’s better than Kepa, so they need to stump £80m.
~£9M to £50m would be a lot more than just doubling our money and a bit extra mind.The more i see some of the teams at the top keepers the more I think £50m is a piss poor fee. He’s one of the best keepers in the league already, he’s 23, he’s on a long contract why would we only double our money plus a bit extra when he would be worth way more to a team at the top than a throw away player they’ve spent £30-50m on. Even the so called best keepers in the league like the lad at Villa he’s had way more mistakes and iffy games this season than roooooofs. Just yesterday he was at fault for the goal and nearly fucked up a few other times. £50m is starting to look cheap.
Thought he was £16m there were that many signings I’ve lost track. Still think £50m would be cheap given the state of goalkeepers at the top clubs.~£9M to £50m would be a lot more than just doubling our money and a bit extra mind.
But in general I agree
For some reason keepers generally don’t go for big money compared to striker’s which I find bizarreThought he was £16m there were that many signings I’ve lost track. Still think £50m would be cheap given the state of goalkeepers at the top clubs.
Keeper prices don’t seem to have went up much over the years given how important a position it is and how few top level keepers are around these days. Look at that Buffon fee when was that 2000 or somethingTop Most Expensive Goalkeeper Transfers (Approximate Fees)
You must be logged on to see external links: Athletic Bilbao to Chelsea (€80m / ~£71.6m) You must be logged on to see external links: AS Roma to Liverpool (€72.5m / ~£65m) You must be logged on to see external links: Inter Milan to Manchester United (€50.2m / ~£43.9m)
- : Parma to Juventus (€52.9m / ~£32.6m)
- : Benfica to Manchester City (€40m / ~£34.7m)
- : Barcelona to Valencia (€35m / ~£31.4m)
- : Chelsea to Real Madrid (~€38.8m / £35m)
- £50 million for Onana
£50m would be over four times what we paid for Roefs. That's with add ons included.The more i see some of the teams at the top keepers the more I think £50m is a piss poor fee. He’s one of the best keepers in the league already, he’s 23, he’s on a long contract why would we only double our money plus a bit extra when he would be worth way more to a team at the top than a throw away player they’ve spent £30-50m on. Even the so called best keepers in the league like the lad at Villa he’s had way more mistakes and iffy games this season than roooooofs. Just yesterday he was at fault for the goal and nearly fucked up a few other times. £50m is starting to look cheap.
Think I was getting the fees with the others keepers linked at the time mixed up a few were pretty high weren’t they. The lad that went to Bournemouth, the lad that went to play in the city that doesn’t exist in the Middle East etc think those two were around the £16m mark.£50m would be over four times what we paid for Roefs. That's with add ons included.
I think it’s just easier to find a competent keeper rather than a goal scorer. Every team in the league seems to have a decent one, even Dubravka with his occasional poppadom wrists has been good on the whole.For some reason keepers generally don’t go for big money compared to striker’s which I find bizarre
Imo a keeper is just as important as a striker is
I think this is the case. Most players want to play, so most keepers are first choice somewhereIt probably comes down to it being easier for the big clubs to hoard 3/4 good strikers and still give them game time, whereas a good keeper will want to get out and be a starter rather than be on the bench.
Chelsea have spent a fair wack on keepers and haven’t had a “top” level one since the big head gear lad who’s name I’ve forgotI think it’s just easier to find a competent keeper rather than a goal scorer. Every team in the league seems to have a decent one, even Dubravka with his occasional poppadom wrists has been good on the whole.
Where as strikers there’s not that many that I really think are great. It probably comes down to it being easier for the big clubs to hoard 3/4 good strikers and still give them game time, whereas a good keeper will want to get out and be a starter rather than be on the bench.
Bournemouth paid a mental £25m for Petrovic.Think I was getting the fees with the others keepers linked at the time mixed up a few were pretty high weren’t they. The lad that went to Bournemouth, the lad that went to play in the city that doesn’t exist in the Middle East etc think those two were around the £16m mark.
Petr CechChelsea have spent a fair wack on keepers and haven’t had a “top” level one since the big head gear lad who’s name I’ve forgot![]()
He’s the modern equivalent of clubcall.Nixon probably reckons we’re selling him for 2m the daft old ****
He got the Habib Diarra signing correct but he gets more wrong than right.Has Nixon ever actually got anything right when it concerns us?
Depends what happens from now till next summer. If we finish strong with more stand out performances from him, he goes on to claim the number one shirt in the World Cup etc I’d be absolutely shocked if we accepted £50m as I can see three or four teams in for him at that point.Offers anywhere near £50m come in for Roefs then we’ll cash in imo.