I'm guessing from that headline alone the gist is the Queen is at fault for being seen by Watkins as too soft on him, and despite being in his thirties at least when he began his various activities with Epstein he somehow bears no fault or blame?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm guessing from that headline alone the gist is the Queen is at fault for being seen by Watkins as too soft on him, and despite being in his thirties at least when he began his various activities with Epstein he somehow bears no fault or blame?
The palace media machine have made it clear for years that you avoid multiple topics or you'll be excluded from future coverage.
Maitliss was the first to go against this.
In the future rhe Royal's need to be more transparent re finances and the media less hoop licking.
Was she really the first to push back successfully?The palace media machine have made it clear for years that you avoid multiple topics or you'll be excluded from future coverage.
Maitliss was the first to go against this.
In the future rhe Royal's need to be more transparent re finances and the media less hoop licking.
Very accurate description.Andrew's nickname among Royal Protection Officers. NSFW.
You must be logged on to see media items
SuccinctAndrew's nickname among Royal Protection Officers. NSFW.
You must be logged on to see media items
I'm confused about that first bit, asYou must be logged on to see external links:
If a case passes both stages of our legal test, we will authorise the police to charge the suspect.
The prosecutor will decide which charges are most appropriate, based on the available evidence.
The police will charge the suspect with these offences and the case will be listed for a first hearing.
The shame belongs entirely to Andrew but let’s not pretend that anyone would give a shit if he wasn’t famous.Right-wing commentators have lost their marbles.
Logon or register to see this image
Logon or register to see this image
Not quite. It's either the police that charge, and they do so in about two thirds of cases and it's the CPS that decide to bring charges in the remainder of cases. I assumed the police charged in all cases and never realised it was just the majority of the time they do.You couldn't be more wrong if you triedPolice arrest, gather evidence then submit the evidence to the CPS who decide whether to prosecute or not.
Was she really the first to push back successfully?
That interview was so excellent. Brilliantly done by Maitliss.
That was a mutual whore off scandal sheet... hardly investigative journalismBashir and Diana was more about her using the interview to settle scores.
The shame belongs entirely to Andrew but let’s not pretend that anyone would give a shit if he wasn’t famous.
I'm absolutely shocked to learn that he isn't a good person.Andrew's nickname among Royal Protection Officers. NSFW.
You must be logged on to see media items
Fine. As long as you're prepared to wait a while. There's quite a lot of business to deal with in Parliament at the moment and some of it is rather important. So I'd hope this wasn't given top priority; I mean it's a symbolic gesture given that it makes no practical difference unless 7 other people, some of whom are children, die before TTFKAP (The Tosser Formerly Known As Prince) shuffles off.You must be logged on to see external links
As a supporter of the Monarchy I would support this. The whole principle of a constitutional monarchy is that they should operate within the law so if they break the law then they should forfeit their privileges.
Pointless, expensive exercise.Fine. As long as you're prepared to wait a while. There's quite a lot of business to deal with in Parliament at the moment and some of it is rather important. So I'd hope this wasn't given top priority; I mean it's a symbolic gesture given that it makes no practical difference unless 7 other people, some of whom are children, die before TTFKAP (The Tosser Formerly Known As Prince) shuffles off.
After the UK Parliament approves his removal from the line of succession, it has to go to 14 other Commonwealth countries Parliaments for their approval. So I hope you're not in a hurry.
If there are resources flung at this to get it done quickly I think I'd be slightly annoyed but I can imagine they will be, given that the media will be droning on about it incessantly and wondering why it hasn't happened - even though they know fine well - for as long as it takes.
I thought you meant his nick name was "NSFW", which would be a bit of a mouthful.Andrew's nickname among Royal Protection Officers. NSFW.
You must be logged on to see media items
Let's get this in to perspective.And a cap doffer like you. They'll never do anything wrong in your eyes. Do you even think andrew has done out wrong? Wouldnt be surprised if you said 'no,god bless im'.
Ok then. So there are a lot of cap doffers. And?Let's get this in to perspective.
YouGov have released figures since this has all blown up.
The Royal Family as an institution has an approval rating with the British public of over 60%
The King is 63%
Prince William is 74%
To bring that in to focus, the Labour Government waas elected with just over 12% of the population voting for them.
You can sling names like Cap Doffer and Hoop Licker all you like marra, but you are firmly in a minority, albeit a very vocal one.