• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested

John Steed said:
I said the sun reported he'd paid that money. I said there was no proof that he had paid as he has denied chipping in.
I did not say I'd read any article.
I did not say I disbelieved the article.
I did not say I believed charles instead.

Once again you've made shit up and are trying to say it's what I said. That's all you've done in this conversation because you know what I originally said was correct and you don't like that. It really is a waste of time trying to converse with someone like you.
Click to expand...
And a cap doffer like you. They'll never do anything wrong in your eyes. Do you even think andrew has done out wrong? Wouldnt be surprised if you said 'no,god bless im'.
 

Skylon said:
And a cap doffer like you. They'll never do anything wrong in your eyes. Do you even think andrew has done out wrong? Wouldnt be surprised if you said 'no,god bless im'.
Click to expand...
More straw men from you. It's a sign of a lack of intelligence that you can't understand the point of the person you're discussing with. So you argue from a non existent standpoint using a logical fallacy. Why? Because you have nothing else to come back with. I'll leave you with your hate, anger and stupidity. 👍
 
John Steed said:
More straw men from you. It's a sign of a lack of intelligence that you can't understand the point of the person you're discussing with. So you argue from a non existent standpoint using a logical fallacy. Why? Because you have nothing else to come back with. I'll leave you with your hate, anger and stupidity. 👍
Click to expand...
You are making the point that king tampon has done nothing wrong. I am saying he has,by paying some of the fee to keep andrew out of court. He is also paying andrew 150 grand a year.
 
the dude said:
What's the point though? All the preparation will probably cost millions and he'd never be anywhere near the thrown anyway.
Click to expand...
I don't know, it probably won't cost millions as the protocol will be centuries old and I do think while symbolic it would be important. He should be cast out and shunned.
 
Mr.Thunders said:
So broadcasters are finally asking if perhaps fawning and deference with the Royals may not have been the way forward?

All those hoop licking Royal lovers on the box must feel a bit silly now.

Fancy not being able to ask Harry why he dressed up like a Nazi or Wills he if he likes super injunctions?
Click to expand...

Kim-Jong Charles has
You must be logged on to see external links
when speaking to the media which demands precise knowledge of every question in advance (and any deviation in the interview would lead to it being immediately terminated), representatives in the editing suite throughout, the right to know and approve anyone else featuring in the programme, and the right to remove the entire interview before broadcast.

Don't want the peasants to see the wizard behind the curtain.
 
John Steed said:
The only reason I mentioned the sun was because the person I replied to had brought up this £1.5m that Charles has supposedly paid. As a reason for people to feel a bit silly about the coronation now.
When I said no evidence I was talking about evidence that is in the public domain. There isn't any, Charles denied paying towards the payoff and that's all we know. It's irrelevant if the police know different as the public don't know so have nothing to feel silly about to do with that.
Thinking about it why would the police have evidence that the king did chip in to pay the girl off? As it was a family thing the police will have had nothing to do with who paid what. I'd guess the sun will say they got their info from a royal aide and can't reveal their source. This is easily denied by the family, so there is no proof. I doubt the queen would need Charles to chip in anyway. She wasn't exactly short of a few quid.
Click to expand...

I don't think you read my reply. There's no publicly available evidence that Charles chipped in to the payoff or not so as I said speculation is useless either way.
 
Monty Pigeon said:
Right-wing commentators have lost their marbles.

Logon or register to see this image

Logon or register to see this image
Click to expand...
Brendan and the rest of the Spiked/Living Marxism/Revolutionary Communist Party lot never had a marble to roll between them, whether it was back when they were denying Srebrenica or now when they're professional whyohwhy contrarians.
 
The King of Um said:
Kim-Jong Charles has
You must be logged on to see external links
when speaking to the media which demands precise knowledge of every question in advance (and any deviation in the interview would lead to it being immediately terminated), representatives in the editing suite throughout, the right to know and approve anyone else featuring in the programme, and the right to remove the entire interview before broadcast.

Don't want the peasants to see the wizard behind the curtain.
Click to expand...

The palace media machine have made it clear for years that you avoid multiple topics or you'll be excluded from future coverage.

Maitliss was the first to go against this.

In the future rhe Royal's need to be more transparent re finances and the media less hoop licking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top