• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Any changes for 2nd Test 🤔


I feel for wood, but only lasting 2 days of a possible 25 just isn’t good enough really.

In terms of who comes in, Tongue seems like the obvious choice but Potts has 2/40 today.
 
Wood likely to miss second test due to knee injury

When he only bowled 3 overs in the 2nd innings I called it that it was probably because he was injured. If he wasn't it was an absolute nonsense not to bowl him more.

Hopefully it's nothing serious and he can come back later in the series. We need his pace and aggression.
 
The article says Tongue is the back up unless they pick Bashir.

Personally I'd have preferred Potts.
Yeh,Archer and Carse for all out pace with Atkinson and Potts offering more control,hopefully.
38 tests in 10.5 years says it all really. Time to move on. It was always a big ask expecting him to do much in this series when he hasn't bowled all summer.
Circa £10m from central contracts equates to £200k+ per test!
 
I feel for wood, but only lasting 2 days of a possible 25 just isn’t good enough really.

In terms of who comes in, Tongue seems like the obvious choice but Potts has 2/40 today.
He isn’t out of the series yet mind

I must say I find the general attitude to him on this board a bit odd. He’s never been a rhythm fast bowler (Archer, Steyn, Ambrose etc). He’s chucked his entire body into it, it’s no wonder he gets injured more than most! (That’s hardly being made of Pringles)

Seems a top bloke and has decided to stick with test cricket rather than chase the white ball cash. Fair play to him

I think we also forget that England has had very few genuine quick bowlers in most of our lifetimes
 
He isn’t out of the series yet mind

I must say I find the general attitude to him on this board a bit odd. He’s never been a rhythm fast bowler (Archer, Steyn, Ambrose etc). He’s chucked his entire body into it, it’s no wonder he gets injured more than most! (That’s hardly being made of Pringles)

Seems a top bloke and has decided to stick with test cricket rather than chase the white ball cash. Fair play to him

I think we also forget that England has had very few genuine quick bowlers in most of our lifetimes
Blokes don’t injured on purpose.

Like you say seems a very genuine bloke who has been very unlucky with injuries.
 
They’re pinning some blame on the fact he wasn’t able to complete his full ‘recovery routine’ during the game due to us batting like idiots. Part of the batting side of the game many under appreciate, the need to give bowlers time to rest and recover.
 
They’re pinning some blame on the fact he wasn’t able to complete his full ‘recovery routine’ during the game due to us batting like idiots. Part of the batting side of the game many under appreciate, the need to give bowlers time to rest and recover.
If he can only bowl 10 overs in an innings before he needs a lengthy recovery spell he's hardly suited to test cricket regardless of how explosive he may be. An average test innings probably 80-100 overs,and he can only bowl 10 overs. Puts a heavy workload on the rest of the attack if he can't recover to bowl a 2nd spell.
People who put across rational and well argued points were not the ones labeled negative and whingers

The last 2 ashes before this one and plenty others we have been lambs to the slaughter.

To go there last time with openers like Burns and Hameed who put no pressure on the bowlers and just looked to defend was a bigger recipe for defeat than this approach.

But like you say we need to find the balance between the two, more than happy to accept your argument there mate that Bazball needs to adapt more at times
I see you're reverting to selective memory mode in your initial sentence. "Proper cricket"and "Passionate supporters" also escaped your censure also presumably😀.
Good to know though that you've finally accepted the concerns many expressed earlier re Bazball.
I'm confident that with that sensible adjustment our top 6 can be consistently effective. I agree and see the logic in the Crawley/Duckett opening pair. The batting depth can cope with their frequent failures imo
With the occasional success and worthwhile bonus.
 
Last edited:
If he can only bowl 10 overs in an innings before he needs a lengthy recovery spell he's hardly suited to test cricket regardless of how explosive he may be. An average test innings probably 80-100 overs,and he can only bowl 10 overs. Puts a heavy workload on the rest of the attack if he can't recover to bowl a 2nd spell.
I certainly don’t disagree with that. He probably could and maybe should have retired from England a year or maybe even two years ago in reality. And with that, probably retiring full stop.
 
I certainly don’t disagree with that. He probably could and maybe should have retired from England a year or maybe even two years ago in reality. And with that, probably retiring full stop.
With lucrative central contracts being offered he was never going to do that. He threatened to seek franchise contacts and ECB fell for it.
No fool,Woody
 
Really looking forward to this like :cool:.

Mental it's been a fortnight since the last test :lol:
It's like the 1st test of a 4 test series, just gotta win 3 of them ;)
He isn’t out of the series yet mind

I must say I find the general attitude to him on this board a bit odd. He’s never been a rhythm fast bowler (Archer, Steyn, Ambrose etc). He’s chucked his entire body into it, it’s no wonder he gets injured more than most! (That’s hardly being made of Pringles)

Seems a top bloke and has decided to stick with test cricket rather than chase the white ball cash. Fair play to him

I think we also forget that England has had very few genuine quick bowlers in most of our lifetimes
I think he will play the 3rd test with a limit on how many overs per day 10 max.
He will have had 3 weeks to recover from the 1st test and can use the next two weeks to prep for the 3rd test.

Then the 5th will all depend on how that test goes, can't see him playing the 4th.

Always thought this series would be his test swansong.
I'd also add that if Wood knows its the end and his final game or games then he will probably only bowl faster, especially if we are still in with a chance in the series.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top