Everyone accepts the limitations at some level because nobody advocates 53 sides, one for each county. The only argument is whether you want 18, or 8, or some number in between. The principle that every county can’t have equal status was set 150 years ago.Basically it boils down to whether you accept that limitations that Franchise demands, supposedly, is the best way forward to spread cricket nationwide. English cricket had a very good tv deal prior to the concept of Franchise cricket and both ground attendances and tv figures have fallen year on year in the Hundred competition since its conception. Running down all other forms and wholly relying wholly on an already falling form doesn't appear to be sound financial logic.
Someone commented that only Durham and Somerset really miss out because the other counties have someone nearby. But self evidently, Northumberland, Devon, Cornwall and most of the Welsh counties miss out even more. And they don’t just miss out by getting a virtual second tier competition in August. They’ve had actual 2nd tier competition all year for a century or more.
I would suggest that this isn’t an argument in principle about having two tiers it’s a parochial argument about which tier Durham should be in. When it reduces to that, I am obviously on the side of “the top one” but I think we should be a bit more honest about it.
Last edited: