• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Lords

I think it's because the tourists traditionally are given a game at "the home of cricket". Lords only get 2 tests if there are 2 touring teams. Lords and the Oval raise by far the biggest revenue. Hence Oval always hosts the final tests. Provincial grounds e.g. Chester-le -Street can't get anywhere near those revenues. The only criticism is why Hampshire appear to be in the circuit.
I suppose with Hampshire its convenience. Relatively modern, decent facilities, hotel on sight. Perfect for broadcasters too.

Its just totally devoid or soul or charm and in the middle of nowhere.
 

Yeah your population density is certainly a fair argument up to a point.

Is it right just to sell to people who can afford the Lords prices because you can sell them and price ordinary folk out of it.

Plus there is still this element of British superiority complex that I don’t like in sport in this country.

The Golf calling themselves ‘ The Open and the winner ‘ champion golfer of the year’ as if other tournaments don’t matter.

And Wimbledon and Lords test is just another example of that snobbery outlook.

Imo of course ;)
There is a balance imo. I’ve said on a recent thread that I’m fucked off with lords prices personally, it’s got mad
 
The egg and bacon stuff is limited to the pavilion. The prices are just because they can.

It’s £25 tomorrow fwiw

The prices are a bit of a piss take but you do get something unique to other grounds, and generally away from the members pavilion I don't find it "stuffy". We've always sat in Edrich/Compton upper and generally been surrounded by pleasant people from a mix of backgrounds.
 
The egg and bacon stuff is limited to the pavilion. The prices are just because they can.

It’s £25 tomorrow fwiw

Should be free to be honest, but I’m not getting stuck into them over that.
Why not? It's far cheaper to watch a county game than a professional football game at the top level, football is no working class sport.

Because in football there is such a thing as a national stadium, in cricket, most countries will only play one Test per year at the same venue. Test cricket traditionally is played at different places - whereas football generally isn’t.
 
Last edited:
Should be free to be honest, but I’m not getting stuck into them over that.


Because in football there is such a thing as a national stadium, in cricket, most countries will only play one Test per year at the same venue. Test cricket traditionally is played at different places - whereas football generally isn’t.

Fair point but Lords is seen as the home of the cricket and generally the headquarters for the English national team.
 
Should be free to be honest, but I’m not getting stuck into them over that.


Because in football there is such a thing as a national stadium, in cricket, most countries will only play one Test per year at the same venue. Test cricket traditionally is played at different places - whereas football generally isn’t.
Making it free doesn’t make any sense. As nice as it sounds
 
Been there to watch a couple of days play at over £100 a time and done the tour at £25. The tour was by far the better value/experience.

It's terrible that a snooty private members club has so much influence over the second most popular sport in the country in 2025 tbh.
 
I used to live in North London and watch Middlesex play a fair bit, as well as seeing some day 5s of test matches.

Now I live in South London and have been going to the Oval for a few years, it’s no exaggeration to say I may never set foot in Lord’s again! It represents so much wrong with cricket and society, and they’re just so far up their own arse.

Tickets are expensive anywhere (especially in London), but at least if I spend £100 for an oval test match, I can enter the pavilion and enjoy the facilities without wearing a suit and tie, and without the air of pretentiousness wafting around.

You also have bellends like Farage and Rees Mogg in previous years at the Lord’s test, more just to be at the Lord’s test than to be at a cricket match, making it all a bit of a circus.
 
Making it free doesn’t make any sense. As nice as it sounds

It makes perfect sense, it means it is far more likely that you’ll fill the ground, thus creating some sort of atmosphere. Cause clearly charging an arm and a leg as they have done for the first four days hasn’t helped create one.
 
Back
Top