mackembhoy
Striker
Because Crawley is a lot bigger?Thing is though Reiffel was perfect iearlier and really was he that wrong ?
Very similar balls delivered
Would love to hear his opinion on that decision by drs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because Crawley is a lot bigger?Thing is though Reiffel was perfect iearlier and really was he that wrong ?
Very similar balls delivered
Would love to hear his opinion on that decision by drs
It's simple really mate, India are better in many areas..but it's not played on like-for-like ability sometimesReally there are a lot of holes in the this team Crawley, Pope, the seam bowling sub standard spinner.
The form of Stokes with the bat. You only really trust 4 of the batting unit and the bowling is a massive issue.
But that exposes Root. Not sureBurmah and Siraj good bowlers, never been sure of Pope at 3, I have always said would move Root up to 3 and give someone like Pope or Bethell a better chance of success lower down the order.
So Graeme Hick, minus the handy off-breaksOllie Pope vs ball seaming in from quicks in home Tests
Runs: 424
Balls: 725
Dismissals: 20
Avg: 21.20
SR: 58.48
For further context, he has scored 460 runs at 76.66 against balls with no seam movement and 750 runs at 50 against the ones seaming away - both at a SR of 73.4.
| 24 | 23 | 1 | 565 | 196 | 25.68 | 864 | 65.39 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 65 | 3 |
You must be logged on to see external links
|
But Pope comes up from a very crouched position and his knee roll is lower than the stumps.It's because the ball was going down the slope and Pope was hit on the knee roll front leg.
Good point. I guess it’s all a matter of perception.You missed their first one of the day I take it?